Generative Expert System

Improvements in transformer-based deep neural networks, particularly large language designs (LLMs), enabled an AI boom of generative AI systems in the early 2020s. These include chatbots such as ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, and LLaMA; text-to-image artificial intelligence image generation systems such as Stable Diffusion, Midjourney, and DALL-E; and text-to-video AI generators such as Sora. [9] [10] [11] [12] Companies such as OpenAI, Anthropic, Microsoft, Google, and Baidu along with numerous smaller companies have actually established generative AI designs. [7] [13] [14]

Generative AI has utilizes throughout a wide variety of markets, including software advancement, healthcare, finance, entertainment, client service, [15] sales and marketing, [16] art, composing, [17] fashion, [18] and product style. [19] However, issues have been raised about the prospective abuse of generative AI such as cybercrime, the usage of phony news or deepfakes to trick or control people, and the mass replacement of human jobs. [20] [21] Copyright law concerns likewise exist around generative designs that are trained on and imitate copyrighted artworks. [22]

Early history

Since its beginning, researchers in the field have raised philosophical and ethical arguments about the nature of the human mind and the consequences of developing artificial beings with human-like intelligence; these issues have previously been checked out by myth, fiction and approach since antiquity. [23] The concept of automatic art go back a minimum of to the robot of ancient Greek civilization, where creators such as Daedalus and Hero of Alexandria were referred to as having developed devices efficient in writing text, generating sounds, and playing music. [24] [25] The tradition of imaginative automations has actually thrived throughout history, exhibited by Maillardet’s robot created in the early 1800s. [26] Markov chains have actually long been used to model natural languages considering that their development by Russian mathematician Andrey Markov in the early 20th century. Markov released his very first paper on the topic in 1906, [27] [28] and evaluated the pattern of vowels and consonants in the novel Eugeny Onegin using Markov chains. Once a Markov chain is found out on a text corpus, it can then be utilized as a probabilistic text generator. [29] [30]

Academic artificial intelligence

The scholastic discipline of expert system was developed at a research study workshop held at Dartmouth College in 1956 and has experienced a number of waves of improvement and optimism in the years given that. [31] Expert system research study started in the 1950s with works like Computing Machinery and Intelligence (1950) and the 1956 Dartmouth Summer Research Project on AI. Since the 1950s, artists and scientists have actually used expert system to develop artistic works. By the early 1970s, Harold Cohen was developing and showing generative AI works developed by AARON, the computer system program Cohen produced to generate paintings. [32]

The terms generative AI planning or generative planning were used in the 1980s and 1990s to describe AI planning systems, specifically computer-aided process preparation, utilized to create series of actions to reach a defined goal. [33] [34] Generative AI preparation systems used symbolic AI techniques such as state area search and constraint fulfillment and were a “reasonably mature” technology by the early 1990s. They were utilized to create crisis action prepare for military use, [35] process plans for manufacturing [33] and choice strategies such as in prototype autonomous spacecraft. [36]

Generative neural internet (2014-2019)

Since its beginning, the field of artificial intelligence used both discriminative designs and generative models, to design and forecast information. Beginning in the late 2000s, the emergence of deep learning drove progress and research study in image classification, speech recognition, natural language processing and other jobs. Neural networks in this era were normally trained as discriminative models, due to the trouble of generative modeling. [37]

In 2014, improvements such as the variational autoencoder and generative adversarial network produced the very first useful deep neural networks capable of finding out generative models, as opposed to discriminative ones, for complex information such as images. These deep generative designs were the very first to output not just class labels for images however also entire images.

In 2017, the Transformer network enabled advancements in generative designs compared to older Long-Short Term Memory designs, [38] causing the very first generative pre-trained transformer (GPT), referred to as GPT-1, in 2018. [39] This was followed in 2019 by GPT-2 which demonstrated the capability to generalize unsupervised to lots of different jobs as a Structure design. [40]

The brand-new generative designs presented during this duration enabled big neural networks to be trained utilizing without supervision knowing or semi-supervised knowing, instead of the supervised knowing typical of discriminative designs. Unsupervised knowing removed the requirement for humans to manually label information, enabling larger networks to be trained. [41]

Generative AI boom (2020-)

In March 2020, 15. ai, created by an anonymous MIT scientist, was a totally free web application that could generate persuading character voices utilizing minimal training information. [42] The platform is credited as the very first mainstream service to promote AI voice cloning (audio deepfakes) in memes and content development, affecting subsequent developments in voice AI innovation. [43] [44]

In 2021, the emergence of DALL-E, a transformer-based pixel generative design, marked an advance in AI-generated imagery. [45] This was followed by the releases of Midjourney and Stable Diffusion in 2022, which further democratized access to high-quality artificial intelligence art creation from natural language prompts. [46] These systems demonstrated extraordinary abilities in producing photorealistic images, artwork, and designs based on text descriptions, causing extensive adoption amongst artists, designers, and the public.

In late 2022, the public release of ChatGPT changed the accessibility and application of generative AI for general-purpose text-based tasks. [47] The system’s ability to take part in natural discussions, produce imaginative material, help with coding, and perform numerous analytical tasks captured worldwide attention and triggered extensive discussion about AI’s prospective influence on work, education, and creativity. [48]

In March 2023, GPT-4’s release represented another jump in generative AI abilities. A team from Microsoft Research controversially argued that it “might fairly be deemed an early (yet still incomplete) variation of a synthetic basic intelligence (AGI) system.” [49] However, this assessment was contested by other scholars who maintained that generative AI stayed “still far from reaching the benchmark of ‘general human intelligence'” as of 2023. [50] Later in 2023, Meta released ImageBind, an AI model combining several modalities including text, images, video, thermal information, 3D information, audio, and movement, paving the way for more immersive generative AI applications. [51]

In December 2023, Google revealed Gemini, a multimodal AI design readily available in 4 variations: Ultra, Pro, Flash, and Nano. [52] The company incorporated Gemini Pro into its Bard chatbot and revealed strategies for “Bard Advanced” powered by the larger Gemini Ultra model. [53] In February 2024, Google combined Bard and Duet AI under the Gemini brand name, releasing a mobile app on Android and integrating the service into the Google app on iOS. [54]

In March 2024, Anthropic launched the Claude 3 household of large language models, including Claude 3 Haiku, Sonnet, and Opus. [55] The designs showed substantial improvements in abilities throughout various benchmarks, with Claude 3 Opus significantly outperforming leading models from OpenAI and Google. [56] In June 2024, Anthropic released Claude 3.5 Sonnet, which demonstrated enhanced performance compared to the larger Claude 3 Opus, especially in locations such as coding, multistep workflows, and image analysis. [57]

According to a study by SAS and Coleman Parkes Research, China has actually emerged as a worldwide leader in generative AI adoption, with 83% of Chinese participants using the technology, exceeding both the worldwide average of 54% and the U.S. rate of 65%. This leadership is additional evidenced by China’s intellectual property developments in the field, with a UN report exposing that Chinese entities filed over 38,000 generative AI patents from 2014 to 2023, substantially going beyond the United States in patent applications. [58]

Modalities

A generative AI system is built by applying not being watched device knowing (conjuring up for instance neural network architectures such as generative adversarial networks (GANs), variation autoencoders (VAEs), transformers, or self-supervised machine discovering trained on a dataset. The abilities of a generative AI system depend upon the modality or type of the data set used. Generative AI can be either unimodal or multimodal; unimodal systems take only one kind of input, whereas multimodal systems can take more than one kind of input. [59] For example, one variation of OpenAI’s GPT-4 accepts both text and image inputs. [60]

Text

Generative AI systems trained on words or word tokens consist of GPT-3, GPT-4, GPT-4o, LaMDA, LLaMA, BLOOM, Gemini and others (see List of large language models). They are capable of natural language processing, maker translation, and natural language generation and can be used as structure designs for other tasks. [62] Data sets include BookCorpus, Wikipedia, and others (see List of text corpora).

Code

In addition to natural language text, large language models can be trained on shows language text, enabling them to create source code for new computer system programs. [63] Examples consist of OpenAI Codex and the VS Code fork Cursor. [64]

Images

Producing high-quality visual art is a prominent application of generative AI. [65] Generative AI systems trained on sets of images with text captions include Imagen, DALL-E, Midjourney, Adobe Firefly, FLUX.1, Stable Diffusion and others (see Expert system art, Generative art, and Synthetic media). They are commonly utilized for text-to-image generation and neural design transfer. [66] Datasets consist of LAION-5B and others (see List of datasets in computer system vision and image processing).

Audio

Generative AI can likewise be trained extensively on audio clips to produce natural-sounding speech synthesis and text-to-speech capabilities. An early leader in this field was 15. ai, introduced in March 2020, which demonstrated the capability to clone character voices using just 15 seconds of training data. [67] The site got widespread attention for its ability to produce mentally expressive speech for various imaginary characters, though it was later taken offline in 2022 due to copyright concerns. [68] [69] [70] Commercial options subsequently emerged, consisting of ElevenLabs’ context-aware synthesis tools and Meta Platform’s Voicebox. [71]

Generative AI systems such as MusicLM [72] and MusicGen [73] can likewise be trained on the audio waveforms of recorded music in addition to text annotations, in order to generate new musical samples based on text descriptions such as a relaxing violin tune backed by a distorted guitar riff.

Music

Audio deepfakes of lyrics have been created, like the song Savages, which used AI to simulate rap artist Jay-Z’s vocals. Music artist’s instrumentals and lyrics are copyrighted but their voices aren’t secured from regenerative AI yet, raising a dispute about whether artists need to get royalties from audio deepfakes. [74]

Many AI music generators have actually been created that can be generated utilizing a text phrase, category options, and looped libraries of bars and riffs. [75]

Video

Generative AI trained on annotated video can generate temporally-coherent, detailed and photorealistic video. Examples consist of Sora by OpenAI, [12] Gen-1 and Gen-2 by Runway, [76] and Make-A-Video by Meta Platforms. [77]

Actions

Generative AI can also be trained on the motions of a robotic system to create new trajectories for motion planning or navigation. For example, UniPi from Google Research utilizes triggers like “choose up blue bowl” or “wipe plate with yellow sponge” to manage movements of a robotic arm. [78] Multimodal “vision-language-action” designs such as Google’s RT-2 can carry out simple reasoning in action to user triggers and visual input, such as choosing up a toy dinosaur when given the prompt pick up the extinct animal at a table filled with toy animals and other things. [79]

3D modeling

Artificially smart computer-aided design (CAD) can utilize text-to-3D, image-to-3D, and video-to-3D to automate 3D modeling. [80] AI-based CAD libraries might likewise be established utilizing connected open data of schematics and diagrams. [81] AI CAD assistants are used as tools to help enhance workflow. [82]

Software and hardware

Generative AI designs are used to power chatbot products such as ChatGPT, programs tools such as GitHub Copilot, [83] text-to-image items such as Midjourney, and text-to-video products such as Runway Gen-2. [84] Generative AI features have been incorporated into a variety of existing commercially available products such as Microsoft Office (Microsoft Copilot), [85] Google Photos, [86] and the Adobe Suite (Adobe Firefly). [87] Many generative AI models are likewise available as open-source software application, including Stable Diffusion and the LLaMA [88] language design.

Smaller generative AI models with approximately a couple of billion parameters can run on smartphones, ingrained devices, and computers. For instance, LLaMA-7B (a version with 7 billion specifications) can work on a Raspberry Pi 4 [89] and one variation of Stable Diffusion can run on an iPhone 11. [90]

Larger models with 10s of billions of parameters can operate on laptop computer or desktop. To attain an appropriate speed, designs of this size might require accelerators such as the GPU chips produced by NVIDIA and AMD or the Neural Engine included in Apple silicon products. For example, the 65 billion specification variation of LLaMA can be configured to run on a desktop PC. [91]

The advantages of running generative AI in your area include protection of personal privacy and intellectual home, and avoidance of rate restricting and censorship. The subreddit r/LocalLLaMA in specific concentrates on utilizing consumer-grade gaming graphics cards [92] through such techniques as compression. That online forum is one of only 2 sources Andrej Karpathy trusts for language design standards. [93] Yann LeCun has actually advocated open-source designs for their value to vertical applications [94] and for improving AI safety. [95]

Language models with hundreds of billions of specifications, such as GPT-4 or PaLM, typically run on datacenter computer systems geared up with selections of GPUs (such as NVIDIA’s H100) or AI accelerator chips (such as Google’s TPU). These large designs are usually accessed as cloud services over the Internet.

In 2022, the United States New Export Controls on Advanced Computing and Semiconductors to China imposed constraints on exports to China of GPU and AI accelerator chips used for generative AI. [96] Chips such as the NVIDIA A800 [97] and the Biren Technology BR104 [98] were established to satisfy the requirements of the sanctions.

There is complimentary software application on the marketplace capable of acknowledging text produced by generative expert system (such as GPTZero), along with images, audio or video originating from it. [99] Potential mitigation strategies for detecting generative AI content include digital watermarking, content authentication, info retrieval, and device learning classifier models. [100] Despite claims of precision, both free and paid AI text detectors have actually regularly produced incorrect positives, mistakenly accusing students of submitting AI-generated work. [101] [102]

Law and policy

In the United States, a group of companies consisting of OpenAI, Alphabet, and Meta signed a voluntary arrangement with the Biden administration in July 2023 to watermark AI-generated content. [103] In October 2023, Executive Order 14110 used the Defense Production Act to need all US companies to report information to the federal government when training certain high-impact AI designs. [104] [105]

In the European Union, the proposed Artificial Intelligence Act consists of requirements to disclose copyrighted material used to train generative AI systems, and to label any AI-generated output as such. [106] [107]

In China, the Interim Measures for the Management of Generative AI Services presented by the Cyberspace Administration of China regulates any public-facing generative AI. It consists of requirements to watermark generated images or videos, guidelines on training information and label quality, limitations on individual data collection, and a guideline that generative AI need to “comply with socialist core values”. [108] [109]

Copyright

Training with copyrighted content

Generative AI systems such as ChatGPT and Midjourney are trained on big, publicly readily available datasets that consist of copyrighted works. AI developers have argued that such training is secured under fair usage, while copyright holders have argued that it infringes their rights. [110]

Proponents of fair usage training have actually argued that it is a transformative usage and does not include making copies of copyrighted works available to the public. [110] Critics have actually argued that image generators such as Midjourney can create nearly-identical copies of some copyrighted images, [111] and that generative AI programs take on the material they are trained on. [112]

As of 2024, a number of lawsuits related to making use of copyrighted product in training are continuous. Getty Images has actually taken legal action against Stability AI over using its images to train Stable diffusion. [113] Both the Authors Guild and The New York City Times have sued Microsoft and OpenAI over using their works to train ChatGPT. [114] [115]

Copyright of AI-generated material

A different concern is whether AI-generated works can get approved for copyright security. The United States Copyright Office has actually ruled that works created by expert system without any human input can not be copyrighted, since they lack human authorship. [116] However, the workplace has actually likewise begun taking public input to determine if these guidelines need to be improved for generative AI. [117]

Concerns

The development of generative AI has raised issues from federal governments, services, and individuals, leading to protests, legal actions, contacts us to stop briefly AI experiments, and actions by multiple federal governments. In a July 2023 briefing of the United Nations Security Council, Secretary-General António Guterres stated “Generative AI has enormous capacity for excellent and evil at scale”, that AI might “turbocharge worldwide advancement” and contribute between $10 and $15 trillion to the global economy by 2030, but that its malicious use “could cause horrific levels of death and destruction, extensive injury, and deep psychological damage on an unimaginable scale”. [118]

Job losses

From the early days of the development of AI, there have been arguments put forward by ELIZA creator Joseph Weizenbaum and others about whether tasks that can be done by computers actually must be done by them, provided the difference in between computers and human beings, and in between quantitative computations and qualitative, value-based judgements. [120] In April 2023, it was reported that image generation AI has actually led to 70% of the jobs for computer game illustrators in China being lost. [121] [122] In July 2023, advancements in generative AI added to the 2023 Hollywood labor conflicts. Fran Drescher, president of the Screen Actors Guild, declared that “artificial intelligence positions an existential hazard to creative occupations” throughout the 2023 SAG-AFTRA strike. [123] Voice generation AI has been seen as a prospective difficulty to the voice acting sector. [124] [125]

The crossway of AI and work concerns amongst underrepresented groups worldwide remains a critical element. While AI promises efficiency improvements and skill acquisition, concerns about task displacement and biased recruiting processes continue amongst these groups, as outlined in studies by Fast Company. To utilize AI for a more equitable society, proactive steps incorporate mitigating predispositions, promoting transparency, respecting personal privacy and consent, and welcoming varied teams and ethical considerations. Strategies include redirecting policy emphasis on regulation, inclusive style, and education’s capacity for personalized teaching to maximize benefits while reducing damages. [126]

Racial and gender predisposition

Generative AI models can show and amplify any cultural predisposition present in the underlying information. For example, a language design might presume that doctors and judges are male, and that secretaries or nurses are female, if those biases prevail in the training data. [127] Similarly, an image model prompted with the text “a photo of a CEO” might disproportionately create images of white male CEOs, [128] if trained on a racially prejudiced information set. A number of approaches for reducing bias have been tried, such as changing input prompts [129] and reweighting training information. [130]

Deepfakes

Deepfakes (a portmanteau of “deep knowing” and “phony” [131] are AI-generated media that take a person in an existing image or video and change them with another person’s similarity utilizing artificial neural networks. [132] Deepfakes have actually garnered extensive attention and issues for their uses in deepfake celebrity pornographic videos, revenge pornography, fake news, scams, health disinformation, financial fraud, and concealed foreign election interference. [133] [134] [135] [136] [137] [138] [139] This has actually generated actions from both market and government to detect and restrict their use. [140] [141]

In July 2023, the fact-checking company Logically discovered that the popular generative AI designs Midjourney, DALL-E 2 and Stable Diffusion would produce possible disinformation images when prompted to do so, such as pictures of electoral scams in the United States and Muslim ladies supporting India’s Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party. [142] [143]

In April 2024, a paper proposed to use blockchain (distributed journal innovation) to promote “openness, verifiability, and decentralization in AI advancement and use”. [144]

Audio deepfakes

Instances of users abusing software application to create controversial statements in the vocal design of celebs, public officials, and other popular individuals have raised ethical issues over voice generation AI. [145] [146] [147] [148] [149] [150] In action, companies such as ElevenLabs have actually mentioned that they would work on mitigating possible abuse through safeguards and identity confirmation. [151]

Concerns and fandoms have actually generated from AI-generated music. The very same software application utilized to clone voices has been utilized on famous artists’ voices to create tunes that mimic their voices, gaining both significant popularity and criticism. [152] [153] [154] Similar strategies have actually also been used to develop enhanced quality or full-length versions of tunes that have been leaked or have yet to be released. [155]

Generative AI has actually also been utilized to create new digital artist personalities, with a few of these receiving adequate attention to get record offers at major labels. [156] The designers of these virtual artists have likewise faced their fair share of criticism for their personified programs, consisting of reaction for “dehumanizing” an artform, and likewise creating artists which develop impractical or unethical interest their audiences. [157]

Cybercrime

Generative AI’s ability to create realistic phony content has been made use of in numerous types of cybercrime, consisting of phishing rip-offs. [158] Deepfake video and audio have actually been utilized to develop disinformation and fraud. In 2020, former Google click scams czar Shuman Ghosemajumder argued that when deepfake videos become completely practical, they would stop appearing remarkable to viewers, possibly resulting in uncritical approval of false details. [159] Additionally, big language models and other forms of text-generation AI have been utilized to produce phony reviews of e-commerce sites to enhance scores. [160] Cybercriminals have actually created large language models concentrated on scams, including WormGPT and FraudGPT. [161]

A 2023 research study revealed that generative AI can be susceptible to jailbreaks, reverse psychology and prompt injection attacks, making it possible for assaulters to get assist with harmful demands, such as for crafting social engineering and phishing attacks. [162] Additionally, other researchers have shown that open-source models can be fine-tuned to remove their security constraints at low cost. [163]

Reliance on industry giants

Training frontier AI models needs a massive quantity of calculating power. Usually only Big Tech companies have the financial resources to make such investments. Smaller start-ups such as Cohere and OpenAI wind up buying access to information centers from Google and Microsoft respectively. [164]

Energy and environment

Scientists and journalists have actually revealed issues about the ecological effect that the advancement and release of generative designs are having: high CO2 emissions, [165] [166] [167] large quantities of freshwater utilized for data centers, [168] [169] and high quantities of electrical energy usage. [170] [166] [171] There is likewise concern that these impacts may increase as these designs are integrated into widely utilized search engines such as Google Search and Bing; [170] as chatbots and other applications become more popular; [170] [169] and as designs need to be retrained. [170]

Proposed mitigation methods consist of factoring possible environmental expenses prior to model advancement or information collection, [165] increasing efficiency of data centers to reduce electricity/energy usage, [168] [170] [166] [169] [171] [167] building more effective machine learning models, [168] [166] [169] lessening the variety of times that models need to be re-trained, [167] establishing a government-directed structure for auditing the ecological impact of these models, [168] [167] controling for transparency of these designs, [167] regulating their energy and water usage, [168] encouraging researchers to publish information on their designs’ carbon footprint, [170] [167] and increasing the variety of subject professionals who comprehend both maker learning and environment science. [167]

Content quality

The New York Times defines slop as analogous to spam: “substandard or undesirable A.I. material in social media, art, books and … in search engine result.” [172] Journalists have expressed concerns about the scale of low-grade produced content with respect to social networks material small amounts, [173] the monetary rewards from social networks companies to spread such material, [173] [174] incorrect political messaging, [174] spamming of clinical research paper submissions, [175] increased effort and time to discover higher quality or desired material on the Internet, [176] the indexing of generated material by online search engine, [177] and on journalism itself. [178]

A paper published by scientists at Amazon Web Services AI Labs discovered that over 57% of sentences from a sample of over 6 billion sentences from Common Crawl, a snapshot of websites, were maker equated. Much of these automated translations were viewed as lower quality, particularly for sentences that were equated across a minimum of 3 languages. Many lower-resource languages (ex. Wolof, Xhosa) were equated throughout more languages than higher-resource languages (ex. English, French). [179] [180]

In September 2024, Robyn Speer, the author of wordfreq, an open source database that determined word frequencies based on text from the Internet, announced that she had stopped updating the information for numerous reasons: high costs for acquiring information from Reddit and Twitter, excessive focus on generative AI compared to other methods in the natural language processing neighborhood, which “generative AI has contaminated the data”. [181]

The adoption of generative AI tools caused an explosion of AI-generated content across several domains. A study from University College London estimated that in 2023, more than 60,000 scholarly articles-over 1% of all publications-were most likely composed with LLM help. [182] According to Stanford University’s Institute for Human-Centered AI, approximately 17.5% of freshly released computer technology papers and 16.9% of peer evaluation text now incorporate content generated by LLMs. [183]

Visual material follows a comparable pattern. Since the launch of DALL-E 2 in 2022, it is approximated that approximately 34 million images have actually been developed daily. Since August 2023, more than 15 billion images had actually been produced using text-to-image algorithms, with 80% of these produced by models based on Stable Diffusion. [184]

If AI-generated content is consisted of in brand-new information crawls from the Internet for extra training of AI models, problems in the resulting designs may occur. [185] Training an AI model exclusively on the output of another AI design produces a lower-quality design. Repeating this process, where each brand-new model is trained on the previous design’s output, results in progressive destruction and eventually leads to a “design collapse” after multiple iterations. [186] Tests have actually been performed with pattern acknowledgment of handwritten letters and with images of human faces. [187] As a repercussion, the worth of data collected from genuine human interactions with systems may become significantly valuable in the existence of LLM-generated material in information crawled from the Internet.

On the other side, synthetic information is frequently utilized as an option to information produced by real-world occasions. Such data can be deployed to validate mathematical models and to train maker learning models while preserving user privacy, [188] consisting of for structured data. [189] The technique is not restricted to text generation; image generation has actually been employed to train computer system vision models. [190]

Misuse in journalism

In January 2023, Futurism.com broke the story that CNET had been utilizing a concealed internal AI tool to compose a minimum of 77 of its stories; after the news broke, CNET posted corrections to 41 of the stories. [191]

In April 2023, the German tabloid Die Aktuelle released a fake AI-generated interview with previous racing chauffeur Michael Schumacher, who had not made any public looks given that 2013 after sustaining a brain injury in a skiing mishap. The story consisted of two possible disclosures: the cover consisted of the line “deceptively real”, and the interview included an acknowledgment at the end that it was AI-generated. The editor-in-chief was fired quickly thereafter amidst the controversy. [192]

Other outlets that have released short articles whose material and/or byline have been verified or suspected to be developed by generative AI models – frequently with false material, mistakes, and/or non-disclosure of generative AI usage – consist of:

– NewsBreak [193] [194]- outlets owned by Arena Group Sports Illustrated [195] TheStreet [195] Men’s Journal [196]
The Columbus Dispatch [198] [199] Reviewed [200] USA Today [201]
Gizmodo [205] Jalopnik [205] A.V. Club [205] [206] Quartz [207]
Bankrate [209]
Yoga Journal [201] Backpacker [201] Clean Eating [201]
Miami Herald [201] Sacramento Bee [201] Tacoma News Tribune [201] The Rock Hill Herald [201] The Modesto Bee [201] Fort Worth Star-Telegram [201] Merced Sun-Star [201] Ledger-Enquirer [201] The Kansas City Star [201] Raleigh News & Observer [217]
PC Magazine [201] Mashable [201] AskMen [201]
Good Housekeeping [201]
People [201] Parents [201] Food & Wine [201] InStyle [201] Real Simple [201] Travel + Leisure [201] Better Homes & Gardens [201] Southern Living [201]
LA Weekly [218] The Village Voice [218]

In May 2024, Futurism kept in mind that a content management system video by AdVon Commerce, who had utilized generative AI to produce short articles for a lot of the abovementioned outlets, appeared to reveal that they “had produced tens of countless posts for more than 150 publishers.” [201]

News broadcasters in Kuwait, Greece, South Korea, India, China and Taiwan have provided news with anchors based on Generative AI models, prompting concerns about job losses for human anchors and audience rely on news that has historically been affected by parasocial relationships with broadcasters, content creators or social networks influencers. [220] [221] [222] Algorithmically created anchors have also been used by allies of ISIS for their broadcasts. [223]

In 2023, Google apparently pitched a tool to news outlets that claimed to “produce news stories” based on input information offered, such as “details of existing occasions”. Some news business executives who saw the pitch described it as” [taking] for approved the effort that went into producing accurate and artistic news stories.” [224]

In February 2024, Google released a program to pay small publishers to compose three short articles daily utilizing a beta generative AI design. The program does not need the understanding or approval of the websites that the publishers are utilizing as sources, nor does it require the published articles to be identified as being created or helped by these models. [225]

Many defunct news websites (The Hairpin, The Frisky, Apple Daily, Ashland Daily Tidings, Clayton County Register, Southwest Journal) and blog sites (The Unofficial Apple Weblog, iLounge) have actually undergone cybersquatting, with posts produced by generative AI. [226] [227] [228] [229] [230] [231] [232] [233]

United States Senators Richard Blumenthal and Amy Klobuchar have actually expressed concern that generative AI could have a hazardous impact on local news. [234] In July 2023, OpenAI partnered with the American Journalism Project to money regional news outlets for explore generative AI, with Axios keeping in mind the possibility of generative AI companies producing a dependency for these news outlets. [235]

Meta AI, a chatbot based upon Llama 3 which article, was kept in mind by The Washington Post to copy sentences from those stories without direct attribution and to potentially more decrease the traffic of online news outlets. [236]

In reaction to prospective pitfalls around the use and abuse of generative AI in journalism and concerns about decreasing audience trust, outlets around the globe, consisting of publications such as Wired, Associated Press, The Quint, Rappler or The Guardian have actually published standards around how they plan to use and not use AI and generative AI in their work. [237] [238] [239] [240]

In June 2024, Reuters Institute released their Digital New Report for 2024. In a survey of people in America and Europe, Reuters Institute reports that 52% and 47% respectively are uncomfortable with news produced by “mainly AI with some human oversight”, and 23% and 15% respectively report being comfy. 42% of Americans and 33% of Europeans reported that they were comfy with news produced by “primarily human with some help from AI”. The outcomes of global surveys reported that individuals were more unpleasant with news topics consisting of politics (46%), crime (43%), and regional news (37%) produced by AI than other news subjects. [241]

Computer programming portal

Technology portal

Artificial general intelligence – Type of AI with extensive abilities
Artificial creativity – Artificial simulation of human imagination
Artificial intelligence art – Visual media created with AI
Artificial life – Field of research study
Chatbot – Program that mimics discussion
Computational creativity – Multidisciplinary endeavour
Generative adversarial network – Deep knowing technique
Generative pre-trained transformer – Kind of big language design
Large language model – Kind of machine knowing design
Music and synthetic intelligence – Usage of synthetic intelligence to create music
Generative AI porn – Explicit material produced by generative AI
Procedural generation – Method in which information is developed algorithmically instead of manually
Retrieval-augmented generation – Kind of information retrieval using LLMs
Stochastic parrot – Term utilized in device knowing

References

^ Newsom, Gavin; Weber, Shirley N. (September 5, 2023). “Executive Order N-12-23” (PDF). Executive Department, State of California. Archived (PDF) from the original on February 21, 2024. Retrieved September 7, 2023.
^ Pinaya, Walter H. L.; Graham, Mark S.; Kerfoot, Eric; Tudosiu, Petru-Daniel; Dafflon, Jessica; Fernandez, Virginia; Sanchez, Pedro; Wolleb, Julia; da Costa, Pedro F.; Patel, Ashay (2023 ). “Generative AI for Medical Imaging: extending the MONAI Framework”. arXiv:2307.15208 [eess.IV]
^ “What is ChatGPT, DALL-E, and generative AI?”. McKinsey. Retrieved December 14, 2024.
^ “What is generative AI?”. IBM. March 22, 2024.
^ Pasick, Adam (March 27, 2023). “Artificial Intelligence Glossary: Neural Networks and Other Terms Explained”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on September 1, 2023. Retrieved April 22, 2023.
^ Karpathy, Andrej; Abbeel, Pieter; Brockman, Greg; Chen, Peter; Cheung, Vicki; Duan, Yan; Goodfellow, Ian; Kingma, Durk; Ho, Jonathan; Rein Houthooft; Tim Salimans; John Schulman; Ilya Sutskever; Wojciech Zaremba (June 16, 2016). “Generative models”. OpenAI. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ a b Griffith, Erin; Metz, Cade (January 27, 2023). “Anthropic Said to Be Closing In on $300 Million in New A.I. Funding”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on December 9, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Lanxon, Nate; Bass, Dina; Davalos, Jackie (March 10, 2023). “A Cheat Sheet to AI Buzzwords and Their Meanings”. Bloomberg News. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Metz, Cade (March 14, 2023). “OpenAI Plans to Up the Ante in Tech’s A.I. Race”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on March 31, 2023. Retrieved March 31, 2023.
^ Thoppilan, Romal; De Freitas, Daniel; Hall, Jamie; Shazeer, Noam; Kulshreshtha, Apoorv (January 20, 2022). “LaMDA: Language Models for Dialog Applications”. arXiv:2201.08239 [cs.CL]
^ Roose, Kevin (October 21, 2022). “A Coming-Out Party for Generative A.I., Silicon Valley’s New Craze”. The New York Times. Archived from the initial on February 15, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ a b Metz, Cade (February 15, 2024). “OpenAI Unveils A.I. That Instantly Generates Eye-Popping Videos”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on February 15, 2024. Retrieved February 16, 2024.
^ “The race of the AI laboratories warms up”. The Economist. January 30, 2023. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Yang, June; Gokturk, Burak (March 14, 2023). “Google Cloud brings generative AI to developers, organizations, and governments”. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Brynjolfsson, Erik; Li, Danielle; Raymond, Lindsey R. (April 2023), Generative AI at Work (Working Paper), Working Paper Series, doi:10.3386/ w31161, archived from the original on March 28, 2024, recovered January 21, 2024
^ “Don’t fear an AI-induced tasks apocalypse just yet”. The Economist. March 6, 2023. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Coyle, Jake (September 27, 2023). “In Hollywood authors’ fight versus AI, human beings win (for now)”. AP News. Associated Press. Archived from the initial on April 3, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Harreis, H.; Koullias, T.; Roberts, Roger. “Generative AI: Unlocking the future of fashion”. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ “How Generative AI Can Augment Human Creativity”. Harvard Business Review. June 16, 2023. ISSN 0017-8012. Archived from the initial on June 20, 2023. Retrieved June 20, 2023.
^ Hendrix, Justin (May 16, 2023). “Transcript: Senate Judiciary Subcommittee Hearing on Oversight of AI“. techpolicy.press. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved May 19, 2023.
^ Simon, Felix M.; Altay, Sacha; Mercier, Hugo (October 18, 2023). “Misinformation reloaded? Fears about the impact of generative AI on misinformation are overblown”. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. doi:10.37016/ mr-2020-127. S2CID 264113883. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved November 16, 2023.
^ “New AI systems clash with copyright law”. BBC News. August 1, 2023. Retrieved September 28, 2024.
^ Newquist, H. P. (1994 ). The Brain Makers: Genius, Ego, And Greed In The Quest For Machines That Think. New York City: Macmillan/SAMS. pp. 45-53. ISBN 978-0-672-30412-5.
^ Sharkey, Noel (July 4, 2007), A programmable robotic from 60 AD, vol. 2611, New Scientist, archived from the initial on January 13, 2018, recovered October 22, 2019
^ Brett, Gerard (July 1954), “The Automata in the Byzantine “Throne of Solomon””, Speculum, 29 (3 ): 477-487, doi:10.2307/ 2846790, ISSN 0038-7134, JSTOR 2846790, S2CID 163031682.
^ kelinich (March 8, 2014). “Maillardet’s Automaton”. The Franklin Institute. Archived from the initial on August 24, 2023. Retrieved August 24, 2023.
^ Grinstead, Charles Miller; Snell, James Laurie (1997 ). Introduction to Probability. American Mathematical Society. pp. 464-466. ISBN 978-0-8218-0749-1.
^ Bremaud, Pierre (March 9, 2013). Markov Chains: Gibbs Fields, Monte Carlo Simulation, and Queues. Springer Science & Business Media. p. ix. ISBN 978-1-4757-3124-8. Archived from the initial on March 23, 2017.
^ Hayes, Brian (2013 ). “First Links in the Markov Chain”. American Scientist. 101 (2 ): 92. doi:10.1511/ 2013.101.92. ISSN 0003-0996. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2024. Retrieved September 24, 2023.
^ Fine, Shai; Singer, Yoram; Tishby, Naftali (July 1, 1998). “The Hierarchical Hidden Markov Model: Analysis and Applications”. Artificial intelligence. 32 (1 ): 41-62. doi:10.1023/ A:1007469218079. ISSN 1573-0565. S2CID 3465810.
^ Crevier, Daniel (1993 ). AI: The Tumultuous Search for Expert System. New York, New York City: BasicBooks. p. 109. ISBN 0-465-02997-3.
^ Bergen, Nathan; Huang, Angela (2023 ). “A Quick History of Generative AI” (PDF). Dichotomies: Generative AI: Navigating Towards a Much Better Future (2 ): 4. Archived (PDF) from the original on August 10, 2023. Retrieved August 8, 2023.
^ a b Alting, Leo; Zhang, Hongchao (1989 ). “Computer aided process planning: the state-of-the-art survey”. The International Journal of Production Research. 27 (4 ): 553-585. doi:10.1080/ 00207548908942569. Archived from the original on May 7, 2024. Retrieved October 3, 2023.
^ Chien, Steve (1998 ). “Automated planning and scheduling for goal-based autonomous spacecraft”. IEEE Intelligent Systems and Their Applications. 13 (5 ): 50-55. doi:10.1109/ 5254.722362.
^ Burstein, Mark H., ed. (1994 ). ARPA/Rome Laboratory Knowledge-based Planning and Scheduling Initiative Workshop Proceedings. The Advanced Research Projects Agency, Department of Defense, and Rome Laboratory, US Air Force, Griffiss AFB. p. 219. ISBN 155860345X.
^ Pell, Barney; Bernard, Douglas E.; Chien, Steve A.; Gat, Erann; Muscettola, Nicola; Nayak, P. Pandurang; Wagner, Michael D.; Williams, Brian C. (1998 ). Bekey, George A. (ed.). An Autonomous Spacecraft Agent Prototype. Autonomous Robots Volume 5, No. 1. pp. 29-45. Our deliberator is a conventional generative AI organizer based on the HSTS preparation framework (Muscettola, 1994), and our control part is a standard spacecraft attitude control system (Hackney et al. 1993). We also include an architectural element clearly dedicated to world modeling (the mode identifier), and compare control and monitoring.
^ Jebara, Tony (2012 ). Artificial intelligence: discriminative and generative. Vol. 755. Springer Science & Business Media.
^ Cao, Yihan; Li, Siyu; Liu, Yixin; Yan, Zhiling; Dai, Yutong; Yu, Philip S.; Sun, Lichao (March 7, 2023). “A Comprehensive Survey of AI-Generated Content (AIGC): A History of Generative AI from GAN to ChatGPT”. arXiv:2303.04226 [cs.AI]
^ “finetune-transformer-lm”. GitHub. Archived from the initial on May 19, 2023. Retrieved May 19, 2023.
^ Radford, Alec; Wu, Jeffrey; Child, Rewon; Luan, David; Amodei, Dario; Sutskever, Ilya (2019 ). “Language designs are without supervision multitask learners” (PDF). OpenAI Blog.
^ Radford, Alec (June 11, 2018). “Improving language comprehending with not being watched knowing”. OpenAI. Retrieved October 6, 2024.
^ Chandraseta, Rionaldi (January 21, 2021). “Generate Your Favourite Characters’ Voice Lines using Artificial intelligence”. Towards Data Science. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Temitope, Yusuf (December 10, 2024). “15. ai Creator reveals journey from MIT Project to internet phenomenon”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on December 28, 2024. Retrieved December 25, 2024.
^ Anirudh VK (March 18, 2023). “Deepfakes Are Elevating Meme Culture, But At What Cost?”. Analytics India Magazine. Archived from the initial on December 26, 2024. Retrieved December 18, 2024. While AI voice memes have been around in some type considering that ’15. ai’ introduced in 2020, […] ^ Coldewey, Devin (January 5, 2021). “OpenAI’s DALL-E creates possible images of literally anything you ask it to”. TechCrunch. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ “Stable Diffusion Public Release”. Stability AI. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Lock, Samantha (December 5, 2022). “What is AI chatbot phenomenon ChatGPT and could it change humans?”. The Guardian. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Huang, Haomiao (August 23, 2023). “How ChatGPT turned generative AI into an “anything tool””. Ars Technica. Retrieved September 21, 2024.
^ Bubeck, Sébastien; Chandrasekaran, Varun; Eldan, Ronen; Gehrke, Johannes; Horvitz, Eric; Kamar, Ece; Lee, Peter; Lee, Yin Tat; Li, Yuanzhi; Lundberg, Scott; Nori, Harsha; Palangi, Hamid; Ribeiro, Marco Tulio; Zhang, Yi (March 22, 2023). “Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early try outs GPT-4”. arXiv:2303.12712 [cs.CL]
^ Schlagwein, Daniel; Willcocks, Leslie (September 13, 2023). “ChatGPT et al: The Ethics of Using (Generative) Artificial Intelligence in Research and Science”. Journal of Infotech. 38 (2 ): 232-238. doi:10.1177/ 02683962231200411. S2CID 261753752.
^ “Meta open-sources multisensory AI design that integrates 6 kinds of information”. May 9, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2024.
^ Kruppa, Miles (December 6, 2023). “Google Announces AI System Gemini After Turmoil at Rival OpenAI”. The Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Edwards, Benj (December 6, 2023). “Google introduces Gemini-an effective AI model it says can exceed GPT-4”. Ars Technica. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Metz, Cade (February 8, 2024). “Google Releases Gemini, an A.I.-Driven Chatbot and Voice Assistant”. The New York City Times. Retrieved February 8, 2024.
^ “Introducing the next generation of Claude”. Retrieved March 4, 2024.
^ Nuñez, Michael (March 4, 2024). “Anthropic unveils Claude 3, exceeding GPT-4 and Gemini Ultra in benchmark tests”. Venture Beat. Retrieved April 9, 2024.
^ Pierce, David (June 20, 2024). “Anthropic has a fast brand-new AI design – and a creative brand-new method to engage with chatbots”. The Verge. Retrieved June 22, 2024.
^ Baptista, Eduardo (July 9, 2024). “China leads the world in adoption of generative AI, study programs”. Reuters. Retrieved July 14, 2024.
^ “A History of Generative AI: From GAN to GPT-4”. March 21, 2023. Archived from the original on June 10, 2023. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
^ “Explainer: What is Generative AI, the technology behind OpenAI’s ChatGPT?”. Reuters. March 17, 2023. Archived from the initial on March 30, 2023. Retrieved March 17, 2023.
^ Roose, Kevin (February 16, 2023). “Bing’s A.I. Chat: ‘I Wished to Live.'”. The New York City Times. Archived from the initial on April 15, 2023. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Bommasani, R.; Hudson, D. A.; Adeli, E.; Altman, R.; Arora, S.; von Arx, S.; Bernstein, M. S.; Bohg, J.; Bosselut, A; Brunskill, E.; Brynjolfsson, E. (August 16, 2021). “On the chances and threats of foundation models”. arXiv:2108.07258 [cs.LG]
^ Chen, Ming; Tworek, Jakub; Jun, Hongyu; Yuan, Qinyuan; Pinto, Hanyu Philippe De Oliveira; Kaplan, Jerry; Edwards, Haley; Burda, Yannick; Joseph, Nicholas; Brockman, Greg; Ray, Alvin (July 6, 2021). “Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code”. arXiv:2107.03374 [cs.LG]
^ “Purchasing Cursor”. Andreesen Horowitz.
^ Epstein, Ziv; Hertzmann, Aaron; Akten, Memo; Farid, Hany; Fjeld, Jessica; Frank, Morgan R. ; Groh, Matthew; Herman, Laura; Leach, Neil; Mahari, Robert; Pentland, Alex “Sandy”; Russakovsky, Olga; Schroeder, Hope; Smith, Amy (2023 ). “Art and the science of generative AI”. Science. 380 (6650 ): 1110-1111. arXiv:2306.04141. Bibcode:2023 Sci … 380.1110 E. doi:10.1126/ science.adh4451. PMID 37319193. S2CID 259095707.
^ Ramesh, Aditya; Pavlov, Mikhail; Goh, Gabriel; Gray, Scott; Voss, Chelsea; Radford, Alec; Chen, Mark; Sutskever, Ilya (2021 ). “Zero-shot text-to-image generation”. International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR. pp. 8821-8831.
^ Chandraseta, Rionaldi (January 21, 2021). “Generate Your Favourite Characters’ Voice Lines using Artificial intelligence”. Towards Data Science. Archived from the initial on January 21, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Temitope, Yusuf (December 10, 2024). “15. ai Creator exposes journey from MIT Project to internet phenomenon”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on December 28, 2024. Retrieved December 25, 2024.
^ Ruppert, Liana (January 18, 2021). “Make Portal’s GLaDOS And Other Beloved Characters Say The Weirdest Things With This App”. Game Informer. Archived from the original on January 18, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Kurosawa, Yuki (January 19, 2021). “ゲームキャラ音声読み上げソフト 15. ai 公開中 。 Undertale や Portal のキャラに好きなセリフを言ってもらえる” [Game Character Voice Reading Software “15. ai” Now Available. Get Characters from Undertale and Portal to Say Your Desired Lines] AUTOMATON (in Japanese). Archived from the initial on January 19, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024. 英語版ボイスのみなので注意 。; もうひとつ15.aiの大きな特徴として挙げられるのが 、 豊かな感情表現だ 。 [Please note that only English voices are available.; Another significant function of 15. ai is its rich psychological expression.] ^ Desai, Saahil (July 17, 2023). “A Voicebot Just Left Me Speechless”. The Atlantic. Archived from the original on December 8, 2023. Retrieved November 28, 2023.
^ Agostinelli, Andrea; Denk, Timo I.; Borsos, Zalán; Engel, Jesse; Verzetti, Mauro; Caillon, Antoine; Huang, Qingqing; Jansen, Aren; Roberts, Adam; Tagliasacchi, Marco; Sharifi, Matt; Zeghidour, Neil; Frank, Christian (January 26, 2023). “MusicLM: Generating Music From Text”. arXiv:2301.11325 [cs.SD]
^ Dalugdug, Mandy (August 3, 2023). “Meta in June said that it utilized 20,000 hours of certified music to train MusicGen, which included 10,000 “premium” licensed music tracks. At the time, Meta’s researchers detailed in a paper the ethical difficulties that they experienced around the development of generative AI designs like MusicGen”. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023.
^ “Jay-Z’s Delaware manufacturer triggers debate over AI rights”. Archived from the original on February 27, 2024. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
^ “10 “Best” AI Music Generators (April 2024) – Unite.AI”. October 19, 2022. Archived from the original on January 29, 2024. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
^ Metz, Cade (April 4, 2023). “Instant Videos Could Represent the Next Leap in A.I. Technology”. The New York City Times. Archived from the original on April 5, 2023. Retrieved April 5, 2023.
^ Wong, Queenie (September 29, 2022). “Facebook Parent Meta’s AI Tool Can Create Artsy Videos From Text”. cnet.com. Archived from the original on April 5, 2023. Retrieved April 4, 2023.
^ Yang, Sherry; Du, Yilun (April 12, 2023). “UniPi: Learning universal policies via text-guided video generation”. Google Research, Brain Team. Google AI Blog. Archived from the initial on May 24, 2023.
^ Brohan, Anthony (2023 ). “RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Control”. arXiv:2307.15818 [cs.RO]
^ Abdullahi, Aminu (November 17, 2023). “10 Best Expert System (AI) 3D Generators”. eWEEK. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ “Slash CAD model construct times with new AI-driven part creation method|GlobalSpec”. Archived from the initial on January 23, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ “The Role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the CAD Industry”. March 22, 2023. Archived from the original on February 9, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Sabin, Sam (June 30, 2023). “GitHub has a vision to make code more protected by design”. Axios Codebook. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ Vincent, James (March 20, 2023). “Text-to-video AI inches more detailed as start-up Runway reveals new model”. The Verge. Archived from the original on September 27, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Text-to-video is the next frontier for generative AI, though current output is basic. Runway says it’ll be making its brand-new generative video model, Gen-2, available to users in ‘the coming weeks.’
^ Vanian, Jonathan (March 16, 2023). “Microsoft adds OpenAI innovation to Word and Excel”. CNBC. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Microsoft is bringing generative artificial intelligence technologies such as the popular ChatGPT chatting app to its Microsoft 365 suite of organization software application … the new A.I. features, called Copilot, will be available in some of the company’s most popular company apps, consisting of Word, PowerPoint and Excel.
^ Wilson, Mark (August 15, 2023). “The app’s Memories feature just got a big upgrade”. TechRadar. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. The Google Photos app is getting a revamped, AI-powered Memories function … you’ll have the ability to use generative AI to come up with some suggested names like “a desert experience”.
^ Sullivan, Laurie (May 23, 2023). “Adobe Adds Generative AI To Photoshop”. MediaPost. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Generative synthetic intelligence (AI) will turn into one of the most crucial features for innovative designers and marketers. Adobe on Tuesday unveiled a Generative Fill function in Photoshop to bring Firefly’s AI abilities into design.
^ Michael Nuñez (July 19, 2023). “LLaMA 2: How to access and usage Meta’s flexible open-source chatbot right now”. VentureBeat. Archived from the original on November 3, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. If you want to run LLaMA 2 by yourself device or customize the code, you can download it straight from Hugging Face, a leading platform for sharing AI designs.
^ Pounder, Les (March 25, 2023). “How To Create Your Own AI Chatbot Server With Raspberry Pi 4”. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Using a Pi 4 with 8GB of RAM, you can produce a ChatGPT-like server based on LLaMA.
^ Kemper, Jonathan (November 10, 2022). “”Draw Things” App brings Stable Diffusion to the iPhone”. The Decoder. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Draw Things is an app that brings Stable Diffusion to the iPhone. The AI images are generated locally, so you do not need an Internet connection.
^ Witt, Allan (July 7, 2023). “Best Computer to Run LLaMA AI Model in the house (GPU, CPU, RAM, SSD)”. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. To run LLaMA design at home, you will need a computer develop with an effective GPU that can handle the big quantity of data and calculation required for inferencing.
^ Westover, Brian (September 28, 2023). “Who Needs ChatGPT? How to Run Your Own Free and Private AI Chatbot”. Ziff Davis. Archived from the initial on January 7, 2024. Retrieved January 7, 2024.
^ @karpathy (December 20, 2023). “I basically only trust two LLM evals right now” (Tweet) – through Twitter.
^ @ylecun (January 5, 2024). “Nabla’s shift from ChatGPT to open source LLMs …” (Tweet) – by means of Twitter.
^ @ylecun (November 1, 2023). “Open source platforms * increase * safety and security” (Tweet) – through Twitter.
^ Nellis, Stephen; Lee, Jane (September 1, 2022). “U.S. authorities order Nvidia to stop sales of leading AI chips to China”. Reuters. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ Shilov, Anton (May 7, 2023). “Nvidia’s Chinese A800 GPU’s Performance Revealed”. Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2024. Retrieved August 15, 2023. the A800 operates at 70% of the speed of A100 GPUs while adhering to rigorous U.S. export standards that limit just how much processing power Nvidia can sell.
^ Patel, Dylan (October 24, 2022). “How China’s Biren Is Attempting To Evade US Sanctions”. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ “5 free software to identify fake AI-generated images” (in Italian). October 28, 2023. Archived from the initial on October 29, 2023. Retrieved October 29, 2023.
^ “Detecting AI fingerprints: A guide to watermarking and beyond”. Brookings Institution. January 4, 2024. Archived from the initial on September 3, 2024. Retrieved September 5, 2024.
^ Fowler, Geoffrey (April 3, 2023). “We checked a new ChatGPT-detector for teachers. It flagged an innocent trainee”. washingtonpost.com. Archived from the initial on March 28, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Fowler, Geoffrey (June 2, 2023). “Detecting AI might be impossible. That’s a big issue for instructors”. washingtonpost.com. Archived from the original on June 3, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Bartz, Diane; Hu, Krystal (July 21, 2023). “OpenAI, Google, others pledge to watermark AI content for safety, White House says”. Reuters. Archived from the initial on July 27, 2023.
^ “FACT SHEET: President Biden Issues Executive Order on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Expert System”. The White House. October 30, 2023. Archived from the original on January 30, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Burt, Andrew (October 31, 2023). “3 Obstacles to Regulating Generative AI”. Harvard Business Review. ISSN 0017-8012. Archived from the initial on February 17, 2024. Retrieved February 17, 2024.
^ “EU AI Act: very first guideline on synthetic intelligence”. European Parliament. August 6, 2023. Retrieved September 13, 2024.
^ Chee, Foo Yun; Mukherjee, Supantha (June 14, 2023). “EU legislators vote for tougher AI guidelines as draft relocate to last stage”. Reuters. Archived from the original on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 26, 2023.
^ Ye, Josh (July 13, 2023). “China says generative AI rules to use just to products for the public”. Reuters. Archived from the original on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 13, 2023.
^ “生成式人工智能服务管理暂行办法”. July 13, 2023. Archived from the initial on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 27, 2023.
^ a b “Generative Expert system and Copyright Law”. Congressional Research Service. LSB10922. September 29, 2023. Archived from the original on March 22, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Thompson, Stuart (January 25, 2024). “We Asked A.I. to Create the Joker. It Generated a Copyrighted Image”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on January 25, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Hadero, Haleluya; Bauder, David (December 27, 2023). “The New york city Times sues OpenAI and Microsoft for using its stories to train chatbots”. Associated Press News. AP News. Archived from the original on December 27, 2023. Retrieved April 13, 2023.
^ O’Brien, Matt (September 25, 2023). “Photo huge Getty took a leading AI image-maker to court. Now it’s likewise welcoming the technology”. AP NEWS. Associated Press. Archived from the original on January 30, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Barber, Gregory (December 9, 2023). “The Generative AI Copyright Fight Is Just Getting Going”. Wired. Archived from the original on January 19, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ Bruell, Alexandra (December 27, 2023). “New York Times Sues Microsoft and OpenAI, Alleging Copyright Infringement”. Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on January 18, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ Brittain, Blake (August 21, 2023). “AI-generated art can not get copyrights, US court says”. Reuters. Archived from the original on January 20, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ David, Emilla (August 29, 2023). “US Copyright Office desires to hear what people think about AI and copyright”. The Verge. Archived from the initial on January 19, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ “Secretary-General’s remarks to the Security Council on Artificial Intelligence”. un.org. July 18, 2023. Archived from the original on July 28, 2023. Retrieved July 27, 2023.
^ “The Writers Strike Is Taking a Stand on AI”. Time. May 4, 2023. Archived from the original on June 11, 2023. Retrieved June 11, 2023.
^ Tarnoff, Ben (August 4, 2023). “Lessons from Eliza”. The Guardian Weekly. pp. 34-39.
^ Zhou, Viola (April 11, 2023). “AI is currently taking video game illustrators’ jobs in China”. Rest of World. Archived from the original on August 13, 2023. Retrieved August 17, 2023.
^ Carter, Justin (April 11, 2023). “China’s game art market supposedly annihilated by growing AI utilize”. Game Developer. Archived from the initial on August 17, 2023. Retrieved August 17, 2023.
^ Collier, Kevin (July 14, 2023). “Actors vs. AI: Strike brings focus to emerging usage of innovative tech”. NBC News. Archived from the initial on July 20, 2023. Retrieved July 21, 2023. SAG-AFTRA has joined the Writer’s [sic] Guild of America in demanding a contract that explicitly requires AI regulations to safeguard authors and the works they produce. … The future of generative expert system in Hollywood-and how it can be used to change labor-has become an essential sticking point for actors going on strike. In a press conference Thursday, Fran Drescher, president of the Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (more frequently known as SAG-AFTRA), declared that ‘expert system postures an existential risk to innovative professions, and all actors and entertainers should have contract language that safeguards them from having their identity and skill made use of without approval and pay.’
^ Wiggers, Kyle (August 22, 2023). “ElevenLabs’ voice-generating tools release out of beta”. TechCrunch. Archived from the original on November 28, 2023. Retrieved September 25, 2023.
^ Shrivastava, Rashi. “‘Keep Your Paws Off My Voice’: Voice Actors Worry Generative AI Will Steal Their Livelihoods”. Forbes. Archived from the original on December 2, 2023. Retrieved November 28, 2023.
^ Gupta, Shalene (October 31, 2023). “Underrepresented groups in countries worldwide are stressed over AI being a threat to jobs”. Fast Company. Archived from the initial on December 8, 2023. Retrieved December 8, 2023.
^ Rachel Gordon (March 3, 2023). “Large language models are biased. Can logic assist in saving them?”. MIT CSAIL. Archived from the original on January 23, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ OpenAI (July 18, 2022). “Reducing predisposition and enhancing safety in DALL · E 2”. OpenAI. Archived from the initial on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Jake Traylor (July 27, 2022). “No quick repair: How OpenAI’s DALL · E 2 illustrated the obstacles of predisposition in AI”. NBC News. Archived from the initial on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ “DALL · E 2 pre-training mitigations”. OpenAI. June 28, 2022. Archived from the initial on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Brandon, John (February 16, 2018). “Terrifying high-tech pornography: Creepy ‘deepfake’ videos are on the increase”. Fox News. Archived from the initial on June 15, 2018. Retrieved February 20, 2018.
^ Cole, Samantha (January 24, 2018). “We Are Truly Fucked: Everyone Is Making AI-Generated Fake Porn Now”. Vice. Archived from the initial on September 7, 2019. Retrieved May 4, 2019.
^ “What Are Deepfakes & Why the Future of Porn is Terrifying”. Highsnobiety. February 20, 2018. Archived from the initial on July 14, 2021. Retrieved February 20, 2018.
^ “Experts fear face swapping tech could begin an international showdown”. The Outline. Archived from the original on January 16, 2020. Retrieved February 28, 2018.
^ Roose, Kevin (March 4, 2018). “Here Come the Fake Videos, Too”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on June 18, 2019. Retrieved March 24, 2018.
^ Schreyer, Marco; Sattarov, Timur; Reimer, Bernd; Borth, Damian (2019 ). “Adversarial Learning of Deepfakes in Accounting”. arXiv:1910.03810 [cs.LG]
^ Menz, Bradley (2024 ). “Health Disinformation Use Case Highlighting the Urgent Need for Expert System Vigilance”. JAMA Internal Medicine. 184 (1 ): 92-96. doi:10.1001/ jamainternmed.2023.5947. PMID 37955873. S2CID 265148637. Archived from the initial on February 4, 2024. Retrieved February 4, 2024.
^ Chalfant, Morgan (March 6, 2024). “U.S. braces for foreign interference in 2024 election”. Semafor. Archived from the initial on March 11, 2024. Retrieved March 6, 2024.
^ Menn, Joseph (September 23, 2024). “Russia, Iran utilize AI to increase anti-U.S. impact campaigns, officials say”. The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on September 24, 2024. Retrieved September 23, 2024.
^ “Join the Deepfake Detection Challenge (DFDC)”. deepfakedetectionchallenge.ai. Archived from the initial on January 12, 2020. Retrieved November 8, 2019.
^ Clarke, Yvette D. (June 28, 2019). “H.R. 3230 – 116th Congress (2019-2020): Defending Each and Every Person from False Appearances by Keeping Exploitation Subject to Accountability Act of 2019”. www.congress.gov. Archived from the initial on December 17, 2019. Retrieved October 16, 2019.
^ “New Research Reveals Scale of Threat Posed by AI-generated Images on 2024 Elections”. Logically. July 27, 2023. Archived from the original on October 3, 2023. Retrieved July 6, 2024.
^ Lawton, Graham (September 12, 2023). “Disinformation wars: The fight against phony news in the age of AI”. New Scientist. Retrieved July 5, 2024.
^ Brewer, Jordan; Patel, Dhru; Kim, Dennie; Murray, Alex (April 12, 2024). “Navigating the obstacles of generative innovations: Proposing the integration of expert system and blockchain”. Business Horizons. 67 (5 ): 525-535. doi:10.1016/ j.bushor.2024.04.011. ISSN 0007-6813.
^ “People Are Still Terrible: AI Voice-Cloning Tool Misused for Deepfake Celeb Clips”. PCMag Middle East. January 31, 2023. Archived from the initial on December 25, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ “The generative A.I. software race has actually begun”. Fortune. Archived from the original on March 25, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Milmo, Dan; Hern, Alex (May 20, 2023). “Elections in UK and US at danger from AI-driven disinformation, state specialists”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on November 16, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ “Seeing is thinking? Global scramble to take on deepfakes”. news.yahoo.com. Archived from the original on February 3, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Vincent, James (January 31, 2023). “4chan users accept AI voice clone tool to produce star hatespeech”. The Verge. Archived from the original on December 3, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Thompson, Stuart A. (March 12, 2023). “Making Deepfakes Gets Cheaper and Easier Thanks to A.I.” The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on October 29, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ “A new AI voice tool is already being abused to make deepfake celeb audio clips”. Engadget. January 31, 2023. Archived from the initial on October 10, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Gee, Andre (April 20, 2023). “Just Because AI-Generated Rap Songs Go Viral Doesn’t Mean They’re Good”. Wanderer. Archived from the initial on January 2, 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Coscarelli, Joe (April 19, 2023). “An A.I. Hit of Fake ‘Drake’ and ‘The Weeknd’ Rattles the Music World”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on May 15, 2023. Retrieved December 5, 2023.
^ Lippiello, Emily; Smith, Nathan; Pereira, Ivan (November 3, 2023). “AI songs that mimic popular artists raising alarms in the music industry”. ABC News. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Skelton, Eric. “Fans Are Using Expert System to Turn Rap Snippets Into Full Songs”. Complex. Archived from the initial on January 2, 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Marr, Bernard. “Virtual Influencer Noonoouri Lands Record Deal: Is She The Future Of Music?”. Forbes. Archived from the initial on December 4, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Thaler, Shannon (September 8, 2023). “Warner Music indications first-ever record deal with AI pop star”. New York Post. Archived from the original on December 15, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Sjouwerman, Stu (December 26, 2022). “Deepfakes: Get prepared for phishing 2.0”. Fast Company. Archived from the initial on July 31, 2023. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Sonnemaker, Tyler. “As social networks platforms brace for the incoming wave of deepfakes, Google’s previous ‘scams czar’ anticipates the biggest risk is that deepfakes will eventually become dull”. Business Insider. Archived from the initial on April 14, 2021. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Collinson, Patrick (July 15, 2023). “Fake reviews: can we trust what we checked out online as use of AI takes off?”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on November 22, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ “After WormGPT, FraudGPT Emerges to Help Scammers Steal Your Data”. PCMAG. July 25, 2023. Archived from the original on July 31, 2023. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Gupta, Maanak; Akiri, Charankumar; Aryal, Kshitiz; Parker, Eli; Praharaj, Lopamudra (2023 ). “From ChatGPT to ThreatGPT: Impact of Generative AI in Cybersecurity and Privacy”. IEEE Access. 11: 80218-80245. arXiv:2307.00691. Bibcode:2023 IEEEA..1180218 G. doi:10.1109/ ACCESS.2023.3300381. S2CID 259316122.
^ Piper, Kelsey (February 2, 2024). “Should we make our most effective AI models open source to all?”. Vox. Retrieved January 13, 2025.
^ Metz, Cade (July 10, 2023). “In the Age of A.I., Tech’s Little Guys Need Big Friends”. New York Times.
^ a b Bender, Emily M.; Gebru, Timnit; McMillan-Major, Angelina; Shmitchell, Shmargaret (March 1, 2021). “On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models be Too Big?”. Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. FAccT ’21. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. pp. 610-623. doi:10.1145/ 3442188.3445922. ISBN 978-1-4503-8309-7.
^ a b c d “AI is an energy hog. This is what it implies for environment change”. MIT Technology Review. May 23, 2024. Archived from the original on August 20, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b c d e f g Dhar, Payal (August 1, 2020). “The carbon effect of artificial intelligence”. Nature Machine Intelligence. 2 (8 ): 423-425. doi:10.1038/ s42256-020-0219-9. ISSN 2522-5839. Archived from the original on August 14, 2024.
^ a b c d e Crawford, Kate (February 20, 2024). “Generative AI’s ecological expenses are skyrocketing – and mostly secret”. Nature. 626 (8000 ): 693. Bibcode:2024 Natur.626..693 C. doi:10.1038/ d41586-024-00478-x. PMID 38378831. Archived from the original on August 22, 2024.
^ a b c d Rogers, Reece. “AI’s Energy Demands Run out Control. Welcome to the Internet’s Hyper-Consumption Era”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the initial on August 14, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b c d e f Saenko, Kate (May 23, 2023). “Is generative AI bad for the environment? A computer researcher explains the carbon footprint of ChatGPT and its cousins”. The Conversation. Archived from the original on July 1, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b Lohr, Steve (August 26, 2024). “Will A.I. Ruin the Planet or Save the Planet?”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hoffman, Benjamin (June 11, 2024). “First Came ‘Spam.’ Now, With A.I., We have actually Got ‘Slop'”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b “Investigation Finds Actual Source of All That AI Slop on Facebook”. Futurism. August 10, 2024. Archived from the original on August 15, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b Warzel, Charlie (August 21, 2024). “The MAGA Aesthetic Is AI Slop”. The Atlantic. Archived from the original on August 25, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Edwards, Benj (August 14, 2024). “Research AI model suddenly tries to modify its own code to extend runtime”. Ars Technica. Archived from the initial on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hern, Alex; Milmo, Dan (May 19, 2024). “Spam, scrap … slop? The latest wave of AI behind the ‘zombie web'”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Cox, Joseph (January 18, 2024). “Google News Is Boosting Garbage AI-Generated Articles”. 404 Media. Archived from the original on June 13, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Beloved Local Newspapers Fired Staffers, Then Started Running AI Slop”. Futurism. July 31, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Thompson, Brian; Dhaliwal, Mehak; Frisch, Peter; Domhan, Tobias; Federico, Marcello (August 2024). Ku, Lun-Wei; Martins, Andre; Srikumar, Vivek (eds.). “A Shocking Amount of the Web is Machine Translated: Insights from Multi-Way Parallelism”. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics ACL 2024. Bangkok, Thailand and virtual meeting: Association for Computational Linguistics: 1763-1775. arXiv:2401.05749. doi:10.18653/ v1/2024. findings-acl.103.
^ Roscoe, Jules (January 17, 2024). “A ‘Shocking’ Amount of the Web Is Already AI-Translated Trash, Scientists Determine”. VICE. Archived from the initial on July 1, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason (September 19, 2024). “Project Analyzing Human Language Usage Shuts Down Because ‘Generative AI Has Polluted the Data'”. 404 Media. Archived from the initial on September 19, 2024. Retrieved September 20, 2024. While there has actually constantly been spam on the internet and in the datasets that Wordfreq used, “it was manageable and frequently identifiable. Large language models produce text that masquerades as real language with objective behind it, although there is none, and their output emerge everywhere,” she wrote. She offers the example that ChatGPT overuses the word “delve,” in a way that people do not, which has tossed off the frequency of this specific word.
^ Gray, Andrew (March 24, 2024). “ChatGPT “contamination”: approximating the occurrence of LLMs in the scholarly literature”. arXiv:2403.16887 [cs.DL]
^ Kannan, Prabha (May 13, 2024). “Just How Much Research Is Being Written by Large Language Models?”. Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence. Stanford University. Retrieved August 16, 2024.
^ Valyaeva, Alina (August 15, 2023). “AI Image Statistics for 2024: Just How Much Content Was Created by AI”. Everypixel Journal. Retrieved August 16, 2024.
^ Shumailov, Ilia; Shumaylov, Zakhar; Zhao, Yiren; Papernot, Nicolas; Anderson, Ross; Gal, Yarin (July 2024). “AI models collapse when trained on recursively generated information”. Nature. 631 (8022 ): 755-759. Bibcode:2024 Natur.631..755 S. doi:10.1038/ s41586-024-07566-y. PMC 11269175. PMID 39048682.
^ Bhatia, Aatish (August 26, 2024). “When A.I.’s Output Is a Risk to A.I. Itself”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Self-Consuming Generative Models Go Mad”. ICLR. 2024.
^ Owen, Sean (April 12, 2023). “Synthetic Data for Better Machine Learning”. databricks.com. Archived from the original on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 4, 2024.
^ Sharma, Himanshu (July 11, 2023). “Synthetic Data Platforms: Unlocking the Power of Generative AI for Structured Data”. kdnuggets.com. Archived from the original on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 4, 2024.
^ Stöckl, Andreas (November 2, 2022). “Evaluating an Artificial Image Dataset Generated with Stable Diffusion”. arXiv:2211.01777 [cs.CV]
^ Roth, Emma (January 25, 2023). “CNET found errors in over half of its AI-written stories”. The Verge. Archived from the original on November 6, 2023. Retrieved June 17, 2023.
^ “A magazine touted Michael Schumacher’s first interview in years. It was in fact AI”. NPR. April 28, 2023. Archived from the original on June 17, 2023. Retrieved June 17, 2023.
^ Al-Sibai, Noor (January 3, 2024). “Police Say AI-Generated Article About Local Murder Is “Entirely” Comprised”. Futurism. Archived from the original on January 5, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ “NewsBreak: Most downloaded US news app has Chinese roots and ‘composes fiction’ using AI”. Reuters. June 5, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 7, 2024.
^ a b Harrison, Maggie (November 27, 2023). “Sports Illustrated Published Articles by Fake, AI-Generated Writers”. Futurism. Archived from the original on December 15, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Christian, Jon (February 9, 2023). “Magazine Publishes Serious Errors in First AI-Generated Health Article”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on December 26, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Schneider, Jaron (December 14, 2023). “B&H Photo Published an AI-Generated Guide Written by a Fake Person”. PetaPixel. Archived from the original on January 4, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Harrison, Maggie (August 29, 2023). “USA Today Owner Pauses AI Articles After Butchering Sports Coverage”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on January 4, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Buchanan, Tyler (August 28, 2023). “Dispatch stops briefly AI sports writing program”. Axios. Archived from the original on January 1, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Sommer, Will (October 26, 2023). “Mysterious bylines appeared on an U.S.A. Today website. Did these authors exist?”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on October 26, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab air conditioner “Meet AdVon, the AI-Powered Content Monster Infecting the Media Industry”. Futurism. May 8, 2024. Archived from the original on June 4, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ O’Sullivan, Donie; Gordon, Allison (November 2, 2023). “How Microsoft’s AI is making a mess of the news|CNN Business”. CNN. Archived from the initial on November 2, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Meade, Amanda (July 31, 2023). “News Corp using AI to produce 3,000 Australian regional news stories a week”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on December 2, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Tangermann, Victor (June 30, 2023). “Gizmodo Staff Furious After Site Announces Move to AI Content”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ a b c Kafka, Peter (July 18, 2023). “Pertaining to your internet, whether you like it or not: More AI-generated stories”. Vox. Archived from the initial on July 18, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Landymore, Frank; Christian, Jon (September 13, 2023). “The A.V. Club’s AI-Generated Articles Are Copying Directly From IMDb”. Futurism. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Stiaplame, Nordiisk (January 28, 2025). “Quartz Is Publishing AI-Generated Articles Based on Other AI Slop, Along With Warning They May Be Filled With Errors”. Futurism. Archived from the original on January 29, 2025. Retrieved January 30, 2025.
^ Carroll, Rory (May 14, 2023). “Irish Times apologises for hoax AI post about women’s usage of phony tan”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on May 14, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Christian, Jon (February 1, 2023). “CNET Sister Site Restarts AI Articles, Immediately Publishes Idiotic Error”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on November 27, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Al-Sibai, Noor; Christian, Jon (March 30, 2023). “BuzzFeed Is Quietly Publishing Entire AI-Generated Articles”. Futurism. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ “Newsweek is making generative AI a component in its newsroom”. Nieman Lab. April 17, 2024. Archived from the original on May 15, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “What remains in a byline? For Hoodline’s AI-generated local news, whatever – and nothing”. Nieman Lab. June 3, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ “AI-generated news is here from S.F.-based Hoodline. What does that mean for standard publishers?”. San Francisco Chronicle. May 8, 2024. Archived from the original on June 5, 2024. Retrieved June 7, 2024.
^ Gold, Hadas (May 30, 2024). “A nationwide network of regional news websites is releasing AI-written short articles under phony bylines. Experts are raising alarm”. CNN. Archived from the initial on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ “Wyoming press reporter captured utilizing synthetic intelligence to create fake quotes and stories”. Associated Press. August 14, 2024. Archived from the original on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Cosmos Magazine releases AI-generated articles, drawing criticism from journalists, co-founders”. ABC News. August 7, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “AI-generated posts are permeating significant news publications”. National Public Radio. May 16, 2024. Archived from the original on June 19, 2024. Retrieved July 8, 2024.
^ a b c Knibbs, Kate (July 30, 2024). “Zombie Alt-Weeklies Are Stuffed With AI Slop About OnlyFans”. Wired. Archived from the original on August 11, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Apple says it will update AI feature after inaccurate news signals”. The Guardian. January 7, 2025. Archived from the initial on January 14, 2025. Retrieved January 14, 2025.
^ “TV channels are using AI-generated speakers to read the news. The concern is, will we trust them?”. BBC News. January 26, 2024. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Tait, Amelia (October 20, 2023). “‘Here is the news. You can’t stop us’: AI anchor Zae-In grants us an interview”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on January 28, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Kuo, Lily (November 9, 2018). “World’s first AI news anchor unveiled in China”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on February 20, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “These ISIS news anchors are AI fakes. Their propaganda is real”. Washington Post. May 17, 2024. Archived from the initial on May 19, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Mullin, Benjamin; Grant, Nico (July 20, 2023). “Google Tests A.I. Tool That Is Able to Write News Articles”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on May 16, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Stenberg, Mark (February 27, 2024). “Google Is Paying Publishers Five-Figure Sums to Test an Unreleased Gen AI Platform”. Adweek. Archived from the original on March 9, 2024. Retrieved April 17, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (February 7, 2024). “Confessions of an AI Clickbait Kingpin”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the initial on May 18, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (January 26, 2024). “How Beloved Indie Blog ‘The Hairpin’ Developed Into an AI Clickbait Farm”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the initial on April 14, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason (July 9, 2024). “A Cherished Tech Blog Is Now Publishing AI Articles Under the Names of Its Old Human Staff”. 404 Media. Archived from the initial on July 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hollister, Sean (July 10, 2024). “Early Apple tech bloggers are surprised to find their name and work have been AI-zombified”. The Verge. Archived from the original on July 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “AI slop is currently invading Oregon’s regional journalism”. Oregon Public Broadcasting. December 9, 2024. Archived from the initial on December 9, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (February 26, 2024). “How a Little Iowa Newspaper’s Website Became an AI-Generated Clickbait Factory”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the initial on February 26, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason; Cole, Samantha; Maiberg, Emanuel; Cox, Joseph (January 26, 2024). “We Need Your Email Address”. 404 Media. Archived from the initial on December 2, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ “Meet the Serbian Businessman/DJ Who Runs the Zombie AI Southwest Journal – Racket”. Racket. February 16, 2024. Archived from the initial on November 13, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Lima-Strong, Cristiano (January 11, 2024). “Senators warn AI might lead to ‘destruction’ of regional news”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on January 11, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “OpenAI strikes $5 million-plus local news deal”. Axios. July 18, 2023. Archived from the original on July 19, 2023. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Kelly, Heather (May 22, 2024). “Meta strolled away from news. Now the business’s utilizing it for AI material”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the initial on May 22, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “How WIRED Will Use Generative AI Tools”. Wired. Archived from the initial on December 30, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Barrett, Amanda (November 15, 2018). “Standards around generative AI”. Associated Press. Archived from the original on September 23, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Viner, Katharine; Bateson, Anna (June 16, 2023). “The Guardian’s approach to generative AI”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Becker, K. B.; Simon, F. M.; Crum, C. (2023 ). “Policies in parallel? A comparative study of journalistic AI policies in 52 worldwide news organisations”. pp. 8-9. doi:10.31235/ osf.io/ c4af9.
^ Newman, Nic; Fletcher, Richard; Robertson, Craig T.; Arguedas, Amy Ross; Nielsen, Rasmus Fleis (June 2024). “Digital Report 2024” (PDF). Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.