Artificial Intelligence Industry In China

The expert system market in individuals’s Republic of China is a quickly establishing multi-billion dollar industry. The roots of China’s AI advancement started in the late 1970s following Deng Xiaoping’s economic reforms highlighting science and innovation as the nation’s main productive force.

The initial stages of China’s AI development were sluggish and encountered significant obstacles due to absence of resources and skill. At the starting China lagged most Western countries in regards to AI advancement. A bulk of the research study was led by researchers who had gotten greater education abroad. [1]

Since 2006, the federal government of individuals’s Republic of China has actually gradually established a national agenda for expert system advancement and became among the leading nations in expert system research and advancement. [2] In 2016, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) launched its thirteenth five-year strategy in which it aimed to end up being a worldwide AI leader by 2030. [3]

The State Council has a list of “nationwide AI groups” consisting of fifteen China-based business, consisting of Baidu, Tencent, Alibaba, SenseTime, and iFlytek. [citation needed] Each company ought to lead the development of a designated specialized AI sector in China, such as facial acknowledgment, software/hardware, and speech acknowledgment. China’s quick AI advancement has considerably impacted Chinese society in lots of areas, consisting of the socio-economic, military, and political spheres. Agriculture, transport, accommodation and food services, and production are the top markets that would be the most affected by more AI implementation.

The private sector, university laboratories, and the military are working collaboratively in lots of elements as there are couple of present existing limits. [4] In 2021, China published the Data Security Law of individuals’s Republic of China, its first nationwide law dealing with AI-related ethical issues. In October 2022, the United States federal government announced a series of export controls and trade restrictions meant to limit China’s access to advanced computer system chips for AI applications. [5] [6]

Concerns have been raised about the results of the Chinese federal government’s censorship program on the development of generative expert system and talent acquisition with state of the country’s demographics. [7] [8]

History

The research and advancement of expert system in China started in the 1980s, with the statement by Deng Xiaoping of the significance of science and innovation for China’s financial growth. [3]

Late 1970s to early 2010s

Artificial intelligence research and advancement did not start up until the late 1970s after Deng Xiaoping’s financial reforms. [3] While there was a lack of AI-related research between the 1950s and 1960s, some scholars believe this is because of the impact of cybernetics from the Soviet Union regardless of the Sino-Soviet split throughout the late 1950s and early 1960s. [9] In the 1980s, a group of Chinese researchers launched AI research study led by Qian Xuesen and Wu Wenjun. [9] However, throughout the time, China’s society still had a generally conservative view towards AI. [9] Early AI advancement in China was hard so China’s federal government approached these difficulties by sending Chinese scholars overseas to study AI and further supplying federal government funds for research study tasks. The Chinese Association for Artificial Intelligence (CAAI) was founded in September 1981 and was authorized by the Ministry of Civil Affairs. [10] The first chairman of the executive committee was Qin Yuanxun, who got a PhD in viewpoint from Harvard University. [citation required] In 1987, China’s very first research study publication on expert system was released by Tsinghua University. Beginning in 1993, wise automation and intelligence have actually belonged to China’s nationwide innovation strategy. [9]

Since the 2000s, the Chinese government has actually further expanded its research study and advancement funds for AI and the variety of government-sponsored research projects has significantly increased. [3] In 2006, China announced a policy concern for the advancement of expert system, which was consisted of in the National Medium and Long Term Prepare For the Development of Science and Technology (2006-2020), released by the State Council. [2] In the exact same year, expert system was likewise mentioned in the l lth five-year plan. [11]

In 2011, the Association for the Advancement of Expert System (AAAI) developed a branch in Beijing, China. [12] At same year, the Wu Wenjun Artificial Intelligence Science and Technology Award was established in honor of Chinese mathematician Wu Wenjun, and it became the greatest award for Chinese accomplishments in the field of expert system. The very first award ceremony was hung on May 14, 2012. [13] In 2013, the International Joint Conferences on Expert System (IJCAI) was kept in Beijing, marking the very first time the conference was kept in China. This occasion coincided with the Chinese federal government’s statement of the “Chinese Intelligence Year,” a substantial turning point in China’s development of synthetic intelligence. [12]

Late 2010s to early 2020s

The State Council of China provided “A Next Generation Artificial Intelligence Development Plan” (State Council Document [2017] No. 35) on 20 July 2017. In the document, the CCP Central Committee and the State Council advised governing bodies in China to promote the development of expert system. Specifically, the strategy described AI as a strategic innovation that has actually become a “focus of worldwide competitors”. [14]:2 The file prompted considerable investment in a variety of tactical areas associated with AI and called for close cooperation in between the state and economic sectors. On the celebration of CCP general secretary Xi Jinping’s speech at the very first plenary meeting of the Central Military-Civil Fusion Development Committee (CMCFDC), scholars from the National Defense University wrote in the PLA Daily that the “transferability of social resources” between economic and military ends is a vital element to being an excellent power. [15] During the Two Sessions 2017,”artificial intelligence plus” was proposed to be elevated to a tactical level. [16] The exact same year witnessed the development of numerous application-level uses in the medical field according to reports. [17] Furthermore, the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) established their AI processor chip research lab in Nanjing, and introduced their first AI specialization chip, Cambrian. [citation required]

In 2018, Xinhua News Agency, in collaboration with Tencent’s subsidiary Sogou, launched its first artificial intelligence-generated news anchor. [18] [19] [20]

In 2018, the State Council budgeted $2.1 billion for an AI commercial park in Mentougou district. [21] In order to accomplish this the State Council mentioned the need for huge skill acquisition, theoretical and useful advancements, along with public and personal investments. [14] A few of the mentioned motivations that the State Council gave for pursuing its AI strategy consist of the potential of artificial intelligence for commercial transformation, better social governance and maintaining social stability. [14] As of completion of 2020, Shanghai’s Pudong District had 600 AI companies throughout fundamental, technical, and application layers, with related industries valued at around 91 billion yuan. [22]

In 2019, the application of expert system broadened to different fields such as quantum physics, geography, and medical research. With the introduction of large language designs (LLMs), at the start of 2020, Chinese scientists started developing their own LLMs. One such example is the multimodal large design called ‘Zidongtaichu.’ [23]

The Beijing Academy of Expert system launched China’s first big scale pre-trained language design in 2022. [24] [25]:283

In November 2022, the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC), Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, and the Ministry of Public Security collectively issued the regulations worrying deepfakes, which ended up being efficient in January 2023. [26]

In July 2023, Huawei launched its version 3.0 of its Pangu LLM. [27]

In July 2023, China released its Interim Measures for the Administration of Generative Expert System Services. [28]:96 A draft proposal on basic generative AI services safety requirements, consisting of specs for data collection and model training was issued in October 2023. [28]:96

Also in October 2023, the Chinese federal government launched its Global AI Governance Initiative, which frames its AI policy as part of a Community of Common Destiny and intends to develop AI policy dialogue with establishing nations. [29] [28]:93 The Initiative has actually expressed concern over AI security dangers, including abuse of information or using AI by terrorists. [28]:93

In 2024, Spamouflage, an online disinformation and propaganda campaign of the Ministry of Public Security, began using news anchors developed with generative expert system to provide phony news clips. [18]

In March 2024, Premier Li Qiang released the AI+ Initiative, which means to integrate AI into China’s genuine economy. [28]:95

In May 2024, the Cyberspace Administration of China revealed that it rolled out a large language model trained on Xi Jinping Thought. [30]

According to the 2024 report from the International Data Corporation (IDC), Baidu AI Cloud holds China’s biggest LLM market show 19.9 percent and US$ 49 million in revenue over the last year. This was followed by SenseTime, with 16 percent market share, and by Zhipu AI, as the 3rd biggest. The 4th and fifth biggest were Baichuan and the Hong-Kong noted AI business 4Paradigm respectively. [31] Baichuan, Zhipu AI, Moonshot AI and MiniMax were praised by investors as China’s brand-new “AI Tigers”. [32] In April 2024, 117 generative AI models had been approved by the Chinese government. [33]

Since 2024, many Chinese technology firms such as Zhipu AI and Bytedance have released AI video-generation tools to competing OpenAI’s Sora. [34]

Chronology of major AI-related policies

Ministry of Science and Technology; Ministry of Industry and Infotech; the Central Leading Group for Cyberspace Affairs

National Development and Reform Commission; Ministry of Science and Technology Ministry of Industry and Information Technology

Government goals

According to a February 2019 publication by the Center for a Brand-new American Security, CCP general secretary Xi Jinping – believes that being at the of AI technology will be critical to the future of international military and financial power competition. [35] By 2025, the State Council goes for China to make fundamental contributions to standard AI theory and to solidify its place as a global leader in AI research. Further, the State Council intends for AI to become “the primary driving force for China’s industrial updating and economic change” by this time. [14] By 2030, the State Council aims to have China be the international leader in the advancement of expert system theory and technology. The State Council claims that China will have developed a “mature new-generation AI theory and innovation system.” [14]

According to academics Karen M. Sutter and Zachary Arnold, the Chinese government “looks for to blend state planning and control while some operational versatility for firms. In this context, China’s AI companies are hybrid players. The state guides their activity, funds, and guards them from foreign competition through domestic market securities, creating uneven advantages as they broaden offshore.” [36]

The CCP’s fourteenth five-year strategy reaffirmed AI as a leading research study top priority and ranks AI initially among “frontier markets” that the Chinese government intends to focus on through 2035. [3] The AI market is a strategic sector often supported by China’s federal government assistance funds. [37]:167

Research and advancement

Chinese public AI financing primarily concentrated on advanced and applied research study. [38] The federal government financing likewise supported multiple AI R&D in the personal sector through equity capital that are backed by the state. [38] Much analytic agency research revealed that, while China is massively purchasing all aspects of AI advancement, facial acknowledgment, biotechnology, quantum computing, medical intelligence, and self-governing cars are AI sectors with the most attention and financing. [39]

According to national guidance on developing China’s modern commercial development zones by the Ministry of Science and Technology, there are fourteen cities and one county chosen as an experimental development zone. [40] Zhejiang and Guangdong provinces have the most AI innovation in experimental locations. However, the focus of AI R&D varied depending upon cities and local commercial development and environment. For circumstances, Suzhou, a city with a longstanding strong manufacturing industry, heavily concentrates on automation and AI infrastructure while Wuhan focuses more on AI executions and the education sector. [40] In connection with universities, tech firms, and national ministries, Shenzhen and Hangzhou each co-founded generative AI labs. [25]:282

In 2016 and 2017, Chinese teams won the leading prize at the Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge, an international competition for computer vision systems. [41] A number of these systems are now being integrated into China’s domestic surveillance network. [42]

Interdisciplinary collaborations play an important role in China’s AI R&D, consisting of academic-corporate cooperation, public-private collaborations, and worldwide cooperations and projects with corporate-government collaborations are the most typical. [1] China ranked in the leading three worldwide following the United States and the European Union for the overall variety of peer-reviewed AI publications that are produced under a corporate-academic collaboration in between 2015 and 2019. [43] Besides, according to an AI index report, China surpassed the U.S. in 2020 in the overall number of global AI-related journal citations. [43] In terms of AI-related R&D, China-based peer-reviewed AI documents are primarily sponsored by the federal government. In May 2021, China’s Beijing Academy of Expert system launched the world’s biggest pre-trained language design (WuDao). [44]

As of 2023, 47% of the world’s leading AI researchers had completed their undergraduate research studies in China. [28]:101

According to scholastic Angela Huyue Zhang, publishing in 2024, while the Chinese government has actually been proactive in regulating AI services and imposing obligations on AI companies, the total method to its policy is loose and demonstrates a pro-growth policy beneficial to China’s AI market. [28]:96 In July 2024, the federal government opened its first algorithm registration center in Beijing. [45]

Population

China’s big population produces a huge quantity of available data for business and scientists, which uses an essential advantage in the race of huge data. As of 2024 [upgrade], China has the world’s largest variety of internet users, producing huge quantities of data for maker knowing and AI applications. [46]:18

Facial acknowledgment

Facial acknowledgment is among the most extensively utilized AI applications in China. Collecting these big quantities of data from its citizens helps further train and expand AI abilities. China’s market is not only conducive and valuable for corporations to further AI R&D but likewise uses incredible economic possible bring in both worldwide and domestic firms to sign up with the AI market. The extreme advancement of the details and communication technology (ICT) market and AI chipsets in the last few years are two examples of this. [47] China has ended up being the world’s biggest exporter of facial acknowledgment technology, according to a January 2023 Wired report. [48]

Censorship and material controls

In April 2023, [49] the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC) provided draft steps stating that tech companies will be obligated to ensure AI-generated material maintains the ideology of the CCP including Core Socialist Values, avoids discrimination, appreciates intellectual home rights, and safeguards user data. [50] [25]:278 Under these draft measures, companies bear legal responsibility for training information and content generated through their platforms. [25]:278 In October 2023, the Chinese federal government mandated that generative artificial intelligence-produced content may not “incite subversion of state power or the toppling of the socialist system.” [51] Before releasing a large language model to the general public, companies need to seek approval from the CAC to license that the design refuses to address specific concerns connecting to political ideology and criticism of the CCP. [8] [52] Questions associated with politically sensitive subjects such as the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre or comparisons in between Xi Jinping and Winnie the Pooh should be declined. [52]

In 2023, in-country gain access to was blocked to Hugging Face, a business that keeps libraries containing training data sets frequently used for large language designs. [8] A subsidiary of individuals’s Daily, the main newspaper of the Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party, offers local business with training information that CCP leaders think about allowable. [8] In 2024, individuals’s Daily launched a LLM-based tool called Easy Write. [53]

Microsoft has actually warned that the Chinese government utilizes generative artificial intelligence to interfere in foreign elections by spreading out disinformation and provoking conversations on divisive political concerns. [54] [55] [56]

The Chinese artificial intelligence design DeepSeek has actually been reported to decline to respond to concerns connecting to features of the 1989 Tiananmen Square demonstrations and massacre, persecution of Uyghurs, contrasts between Xi Jinping and Winnie the Pooh or human rights in China. [57] [58] [59]

Impact

Economic effect

Most agencies [who?] hold positive views about AI’s financial effect on China’s long-lasting financial growth. In the past, traditional markets in China have actually struggled with the increase in labor expenses due to the growing aging population in China and the low birth rate. With the release of AI, operational costs are anticipated to reduce while a boost in efficiency generates earnings growth. [60] Some highlight the significance of a clear policy and governmental support in order to conquer adoption barriers including costs and lack of effectively trained technical skills and AI awareness. [61] However, there are concerns about China’s deepening earnings inequality and the ever-expanding imbalanced labor market in China. Low- and medium-income employees might be the most negatively affected by China’s AI advancement due to the fact that of rising demands for laborers with innovative skills. [61] Furthermore, China’s economic development might be disproportionately divided as a bulk of AI-related commercial development is concentrated in coastal regions instead of inland. [61]

An influential choice by the Beijing Internet Court has actually ruled that AI-generated content is entitled to copyright security. [28]:98

Military impact

China looks for to construct a “first-rate” military by “intelligentization” with a particular concentrate on the use of unmanned weapons and expert system. [62] [63] It is looking into numerous types of air, land, sea, and undersea self-governing vehicles. In the spring of 2017, a civilian Chinese university with ties to the military showed an AI-enabled swarm of 1,000 unoccupied aerial automobiles at an airshow. A media report released afterwards revealed a computer system simulation of a similar swarm development finding and destroying a missile launcher. [4]:23 Open-source publications suggested that China is likewise establishing a suite of AI tools for cyber operations. [64] [4]:27 Chinese advancement of military AI is largely influenced by China’s observation of U.S. plans for defense innovation and fears of an expanding “generational space” in contrast to the U.S. armed force. Similar to U.S. military ideas, China aims to use AI for making use of big chests of intelligence, generating a common operating photo, and accelerating battlefield decision-making. [64] [4]:12 -14 The Chinese Multi-Domain Precision Warfare (MDPW) is thought about China’s response to the U.S. Joint All-Domain Command and Control (JADC2) technique, which looks for to integrate sensing units and weapons with AI and an energetic network. [65] [66]

Twelve classifications of military applications of AI have been recognized: UAVs, USVs, UUVs, UGVs, intelligent munitions, smart satellites, ISR (Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance) software application, automated cyber defense software application, automated cyberattack software, decision support, software application, automated missile launch software, and cognitive electronic warfare software application. [67]

China’s management of its AI ecosystem contrasts with that of the United States. [4]:6 In basic, couple of limits exist between Chinese industrial business, university lab, the military, and the main federal government. As an outcome, the Chinese government has a direct means of directing AI advancement priorities and accessing innovation that was seemingly established for civilian purposes. To further strengthen these ties the Chinese federal government developed a Military-Civil Fusion Development Commission which is meant to speed the transfer of AI innovation from industrial business and research study organizations to the military in January 2017. [2] [4]:19 In addition, the Chinese federal government is leveraging both lower barriers to data collection and lower expenses of information identifying to develop the large databases on which AI systems train. [68] According to one price quote, China is on track to have 20% of the world’s share of information by 2020, with the potential to have more than 30% by 2030. [64] [4]:12

China’s centrally directed effort is buying the U.S. AI market, in companies working on militarily relevant AI applications, possibly approving it legal access to U.S. technology and intellectual property. [69] Chinese equity capital investment in U.S. AI business in between 2010 and 2017 totaled an approximated $1.3 billion. [70] [64] In September 2022, the U.S. Biden administration issued an executive order to avoid foreign investments, “particularly those from competitor or adversarial nations,” from buying U.S. technology firms, due to U.S. nationwide security issues. [71] [72] The order covers fields of U.S. technologies in which Chinese federal government has been investing, consisting of “microelectronics, expert system, biotechnology and biomanufacturing, quantum computing, [and] advanced clean energy.” [71] [72]

In 2024, researchers from the People’s Liberation Army Academy of Military Sciences were reported to have established a military tool using Llama, which Meta Platforms said was unauthorized due to its model use restriction for military purposes. [73] [74]

Academia

Although in 2004, Peking University presented the first academic course on AI which led other Chinese universities to adopt AI as a discipline, specifically given that China deals with obstacles in recruiting and maintaining AI engineers and scientists. [21] Over half of the data scientists in the United States have actually been working in the field for over 10 years, while roughly the same percentage of data scientists in China have less than 5 years of experience. Since 2017, fewer than 30 Chinese Universities produce AI-focused experts and research study items. [61]:8 Although China surpassed the United States in the variety of research papers produced from 2011 to 2015, the quality of its released documents, as evaluated by peer citations, ranked 34th internationally. [75] China especially desire to resolve military applications therefore the Beijing Institute of Technology, one of China’s premier institutes for weapons research study, recently developed the very first kids’s instructional program in military AI in the world. [76]

In 2019, 34% of Chinese students studying in the AI field remained in China for work. [77] According to a database kept by an American thinktank, the percentage increased to 58% in 2022. [77]

Ethical concerns

For the previous years, there are discussions about AI safety and ethical concerns in both private and public sectors. In 2021, China’s Ministry of Science and Technology published the first national ethical guideline, ‘the New Generation of Artificial Intelligence Ethics Code’ on the subject of AI with specific focus on user protection, information personal privacy, and security. [78] This document acknowledges the power of AI and fast technology adjustment by the big corporations for user engagements. The South China Morning Post reported that humans shall stay in full decision-making power and rights to opt-in/-out. [78] Before this, the Beijing Academy of Artificial Intelligence published the Beijing AI principles calling for essential requirements in long-term research and planning of AI ethical concepts. [79]

Data security has been the most typical subject in AI ethical discussion worldwide, and numerous nationwide federal governments have actually established legislation dealing with information personal privacy and security. The Cybersecurity Law of the People’s Republic of China was enacted in 2017 aiming to attend to new challenges raised by AI development. [80] [original research study?] In 2021, China’s new Data Security Law (DSL) was passed by the PRC congress, establishing a regulatory structure classifying all type of information collection and storage in China. [81] This means all tech companies in China are required to categorize their data into classifications listed in Digital Subscriber Line (DSL) and follow particular standards on how to govern and manage information transfers to other celebrations. [81]

Judicial system

In 2019, the city of Hangzhou developed a pilot program artificial intelligence-based Internet Court to adjudicate disputes related to ecommerce and internet-related copyright claims. [82]:124 Parties appear before the court by means of videoconference and AI examines the proof presented and applies relevant legal standards. [82]:124

Because some questionable cases that drew public criticism for their low penalties have been withdrawn from China Judgments Online, there are issues about whether AI based upon fragmented judicial data can reach impartial decisions. [83] Zhang Linghan, professor of law at the China University of Political Science and Law, composes that AI-technology companies may deteriorate judicial power. [84] Some scholars argued that “increasing celebration leadership, political oversight, and decreasing the discretionary area of judges are deliberate objectives of SCR [smart court reform]” [85]

Leading business

Leading AI-centric companies and start-ups consist of Baidu, Tencent, Alibaba, SenseTime, 4Paradigm and Yitu Technology. [86] Chinese AI business iFlytek, SenseTime, Cloudwalk and DJI have received attention for facial acknowledgment, sound recognition and drone technologies. [87]

China’s government takes a market-oriented approach to AI, and has actually looked for to encourage private tech companies in developing AI. [25]:281 In 2018, it designated Baidu, Alibaba, iFlytek, Tencent, and SenseTime as “AI champs”. [25]:281

In 2023, Tencent debuted its big language design Hunyuan for business use on Tencent Cloud. [88]

New leading AI startups include Baichuan, Zhipu AI, Moonshot AI and MiniMax which were praised by financiers as China’s brand-new “AI Tigers” in 2024. [32] 01. AI has likewise been promoted as a leading startup. [89]

Assessment

Academic Jinghan Zeng argued the Chinese federal government’s commitment to global AI leadership and technological competition was driven by its previous underperformance in development which was seen by the CCP as a part of the century of humiliation. [90] According to Zeng, there are traditionally ingrained reasons for China’s anxiety towards protecting an international technological supremacy – China missed both industrial revolutions, the one starting in Britain in the mid-18th century, and the one that came from in America in the late-19th century. [90] Therefore, China’s federal government desires to make the most of the technological transformation in today’s world led by digital innovation consisting of AI to resume China’s “rightful” place and to pursue the nationwide renewal proposed by Xi Jinping. [90]

An article published by the Center for a New American Security concluded that “Chinese government authorities showed extremely keen understanding of the issues surrounding AI and worldwide security. This consists of knowledge of the U.S. AI policy discussions,” and recommended that “the U.S. policymaking community to similarly prioritize cultivating proficiency and understanding of AI developments in China” and “financing, focus, and a determination amongst U.S. policymakers to drive massive needed change.” [35] A short article in the MIT Technology Review similarly concluded: “China might have unparalleled resources and massive untapped potential, but the West has world-leading knowledge and a strong research study culture. Rather than stress over China’s development, it would be sensible for Western countries to focus on their existing strengths, investing heavily in research study and education. ” [91]

The Chinese government’s censorship regime has actually stunted the development of generative expert system [7] [8]

In a 2021 text, the Research Centre for a Holistic Approach to National Security at the China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations composed that the development of AI creates challenges for holistic nationwide security, consisting of the threats that AI will heighten social tensions or have destabilizing impacts on worldwide relations. [28]:49

Writing from a Chinese Marxist view, academics including Gao Qiqi and Pan Enrong contend that capitalist application of AI will lead to higher oppression of workers and more severe social issues. [28]:90 Gao mentions how the advancement of AI has increased the power of platform companies like Meta, Twitter, and Alphabet, leading to higher capital accumulation and political power in fewer financial stars. [28]:90 According to Gao, the state should be the main responsible star in the area of generative AI (producing brand-new material like music or video). [28]:92 Gao composes that military use of AI risks escalating military competitors between nations and that the effect of AI in military matters will not be limited to one nation however will have spillover results. [28]:91

Dialogues between Chinese and Western AI experts about the existential danger from expert system have happened. [92]

Public polling

The Chinese public is typically optimistic concerning AI. [25]:283 [28]:101 A 2021 research study performed across 28 countries found that 78% of the Chinese public believes the benefits of AI exceed the dangers, the highest of any country in the research study. [25]:283 In 2024, a study of elite Chinese university students discovered that 80% agreed or highly agreed that AI will do more great than damage for society, and 31% believed it needs to be managed by the federal government. [93]

Human rights

The extensively utilized AI facial recognition has raised issues. [94] According to The New York Times, deployment of AI facial recognition technology in the Xinjiang region to discover Uyghurs is “the very first known example of a federal government purposefully utilizing synthetic intelligence for racial profiling,” [95] which is said to be “one of the most striking examples of digital authoritarianism.” [96] Researchers have discovered that in China, locations experiencing higher rates of unrest are connected with increased state acquisition of AI facial acknowledgment innovation, especially by local community police departments. [97] [98]

Artificial intelligence.
Expert system arms race
China Brain Project
Fifth generation computer system
List of artificial intelligence business
Regulation of synthetic intelligence

References

^ a b Chang, Huey-Meei; Hannas, William C. (2022-06-22), “Foreign assistance, alliances, and innovation transfer”, Chinese Power and Artificial Intelligence (1 ed.), London: Routledge, pp. 36-54, doi:10.4324/ 9781003212980-4, ISBN 978-1-003-21298-0
^ a b c He, Yujia (2017 ). How China is getting ready for an AI-powered Future (PDF). Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. Archived (PDF) from the initial on 2021-02-15. Retrieved 2020-04-30.
^ a b c d e Luong, Ngor; Fedasiuk, Ryan (2022-06-22), “State plans, research study, and financing”, Chinese Power and Expert System (1 ed.), London: Routledge, pp. 3-18, doi:10.4324/ 9781003212980-2, ISBN 978-1-003-21298-0
^ a b c d e f g Kania, Elsa B. (November 28, 2017). Battlefield Singularity: Artificial Intelligence, Military Revolution, and China’s Future Military Power. Washington D.C: Center for a New American Security. OCLC 1029611044. Archived from the initial on January 14, 2024. Retrieved February 16, 2024.
^ Allen, Gregory (11 October 2022). “Choking off China’s Access to the Future of AI”. Center for Strategic and International Studies. Archived from the initial on 12 October 2022. Retrieved 12 October 2022.
^ Allen, Gregory C.; Benson, Emily (2023-03-01). “Clues to the U.S.-Dutch-Japanese Semiconductor Export Controls Deal Are Hiding in Plain Sight”. Center for Strategic and International Studies. Archived from the initial on 2023-03-03. Retrieved 2023-03-03.
^ a b Zhang, Daqiu; Lin, Yujie (2024-07-02). “生成中国式AI ： 审查之外 ， 科技公司的烦恼清单” [Building a Chinese AI: Beyond censorship, tech business’ list of concerns] Initium Media (in Simplified Chinese). Archived from the initial on 2024-07-11. Retrieved 2024-07-11.
^ a b c d e Lin, Liza (July 15, 2024). “China Puts Power of State Behind AI-and Risks Strangling It”. The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on July 16, 2024. Retrieved July 16, 2024.
^ a b c d 蔡自兴 (13 August 2016). “中国人工智能40 年”. 科技导报 (in Chinese). 34 (15 ): 12-32. doi:10.3981/ j.issn.1000-7857.2016.15.001 (non-active 1 November 2024). ISSN 1000-7857. Archived from the initial on 2022-01-20. Retrieved 2022-02-07. point out journal: CS1 maint: DOI inactive since November 2024 (link).
^ “Introduction to the Chinese Association of Artificial Intelligence”. 中国人工智能学会.
^ Liu, Wei (2023 ), Liu, Wei (ed.), “From Adjustment to Innovation: How China’s Economic Structure Has Been Upgraded”, China’s 40 Years of Reform, Understanding China, Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, pp. 11-33, doi:10.1007/ 978-981-19-8505-8_2, ISBN 978-981-19-8504-1.
^ a b “人民网 世界人工智能国际联合大会今秋将首次在中国举行– 中国科学院”. www.cas.cn. Archived from the initial on 2023-05-04. Retrieved 2023-05-05.
^ “科学网-首届吴文俊人工智能科学技术奖颁奖”. news.sciencenet.cn. Archived from the original on 2023-05-04. Retrieved 2023-05-05.
^ a b c d e “State Council Notice on the Issuance of the Next Generation Artificial Intelligence Development Plan” (PDF). New America. Archived (PDF) from the original on April 13, 2018. Retrieved April 2, 2018.
^ Laskai, Lorand (29 January 2018). “Civil-Military Fusion: The Missing Link Between China’s Technological and Military Rise”. Council on Foreign Relations. Archived from the initial on 18 July 2020. Retrieved 3 June 2020.
^ “中国科学报” 人工智能+” 应上升为国家战略– 中国科学院”. www.cas.cn. Archived from the original on 2023-05-04. Retrieved 2023-05-05.
^ “人民网 强强联合建医疗” 阿尔法狗” 人工智能将问诊肿瘤– 中国科学院”. www.cas.cn. Archived from the original on 2023-05-04. Retrieved 2023-05-05.
^ a b Milmo, Dan; Hawkins, Amy (2024-05-18). “How China is utilizing AI news anchors to provide its propaganda”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on 2024-05-25. Retrieved 2024-05-19.
^ Kuo, Lily (2018-11-09). “World’s first AI news anchor revealed in China”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on 2024-02-20. Retrieved 2024-05-19.
^ Steger, Isabella (2019-02-20). “Chinese state media’s most current innovation is an AI female news anchor”. Quartz. Archived from the initial on 2024-05-19. Retrieved 2024-05-19.
^ a b Cyranoski, David (January 17, 2018). “China gets in the battle for AI talent”. Nature. 553 (7688 ): 260-261. Bibcode:2018 Natur.553..260 C. doi:10.1038/ d41586-018-00604-6. PMID 29345655.
^ Liu, Zhiyi; Zheng, Yejie (2022-04-03). “Development paradigm of expert system in China from the point of view of digital economics”. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies. 20 (2 ): 207-217. doi:10.1080/ 14765284.2022.2081485. ISSN 1476-5284. S2CID 249301337.
^ “自动化所研发出跨模态通用人工智能平台” 紫东太初”– 中国科学院”. www.cas.cn. Archived from the original on 2023-05-04. Retrieved 2023-05-05.
^ “Beijing-funded AI language model tops Google and OpenAI in raw numbers”. South China Morning Post. 2021-06-02. Archived from the original on 2023-11-19. Retrieved 2024-05-21.
^ a b c d e f g h Zhang, Angela Huyue (2024 ). High Wire: How China Regulates Big Tech and Governs Its Economy. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ oso/9780197682258.001.0001. ISBN 9780197682258.
^ Zhang, Laney (April 26, 2023). “China: Provisions on Deep Synthesis Technology Participate In Effect”. Law Library of Congress. Archived from the original on 2024-08-16. Retrieved 2024-08-19.
^ “Huawei unveils Arabic LLM, brand-new data centre in Egypt as part of generative AI push”. South China Morning Post. 2024-05-21. Archived from the initial on 2024-05-25. Retrieved 2024-05-21.
^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n Bachulska, Alicja; Leonard, Mark; Oertel, Janka (2 July 2024). The Idea of China: Chinese Thinkers on Power, Progress, and People (EPUB). Berlin, Germany: European Council on Foreign Relations. ISBN 978-1-916682-42-9. Archived from the original on 17 July 2024. Retrieved 22 July 2024.
^ Bandurski, David (2024-12-20). “AI for All”. China Media Project. Archived from the initial on 2024-12-20. Retrieved 2024-12-22.
^ Zhuang, Sylvie (21 May 2024). “China presents large language design AI based on Xi Jinping Thought”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the initial on 21 May 2024. Retrieved 21 May 2024.
^ “Baidu, SenseTime lead China’s market for business-focused LLMs, says IDC”. South China Morning Post. 2024-08-22. Archived from the original on 2024-08-27. Retrieved 2024-08-24.
^ a b “China’s 4 brand-new ‘AI tigers’ become investor favourites”. South China Morning Post. 2024-04-19. Retrieved 2024-08-24.
^ “China’s AI startups race for clients as titans like Alibaba cut prices”. Nikkei Asia. Retrieved 2024-08-24.
^ “Chinese AI firms fight to stand apart from competitors in text-to-video market”. South China Morning Post. 2024-08-08. Retrieved 2024-08-24.
^ a b Allen, Gregory C. (2019 ). Understanding China’s AI Strategy: Clues to Chinese Strategic Thinking on Expert System and National Security (Report). Center for a New American Security. JSTOR resrep20446. Archived from the initial on 2019-02-07. Retrieved 2019-03-11.
^ Sutter, Karen M. ; Arnold, Zachary (2022-06-22), “China’s AI companies: Hybrid players”, Chinese Power and Artificial Intelligence (1 ed.), London: Routledge, pp. 19-35, doi:10.4324/ 9781003212980-3, ISBN 978-1-003-21298-0
^ Lan, Xiaohuan (2024 ). How China Works: An Introduction to China’s State-led Economic Development. Translated by Topp, Gary. Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1007/ 978-981-97-0080-6. ISBN 978-981-97-0079-0.
^ a b Ashwin Acharya; Zachary Arnold (December 2019). “Chinese Public AI R&D Spending: Provisional Findings”. Center for Security and Emerging Technology. doi:10.51593/ 20190031. S2CID 242961679. Archived from the initial on 2024-04-10. Retrieved 2024-04-10.
^ Larson, Christina (8 February 2018). China’s enormous financial investment in artificial intelligence has an insidious drawback (Report). Science. doi:10.1126/ science.aat2458.
^ a b 21世纪经济报道 (2021-07-10). “解码人工智能” 国家队””. finance.sina.com.cn. Archived from the initial on 2023-04-09. Retrieved 2024-02-16. point out web: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link).
^ Tilley, Aaron. “China’s Rise In The Global AI Race Becomes It Takes Control Of The Final ImageNet Competition”. Forbes. Archived from the original on 2019-05-28. Retrieved 2020-04-30.
^ “Beijing to Judge Every Resident Based Upon Behavior by End of 2020”. Bloomberg News. Archived from the initial on 2020-05-16.
^ a b Zhang, Daniel; Mishra, Saurabh; Brynjolfsson, Erik; Etchemendy, John; Ganguli, Deep; Grosz, Barbara; Lyons, Terah; Manyika, James; Niebles, Juan Carlos (2021-03-08), The AI Index 2021 Annual Report, arXiv:2103.06312.
^ Heikkilä, Melissa (June 9, 2021). “Meet Wu Dao 2.0, the Chinese AI design making the West sweat”. Politico. Archived from the original on April 7, 2023. Retrieved April 7, 2023.
^ Ho, C. (October 15, 2024). “PRC Launches First Algorithm Registration Center, Strengthening AI and Data Regulation”. Jamestown Foundation. Retrieved 2024-10-18.
^ Li, David Daokui (2024 ). China’s World View: Demystifying China to Prevent Global Conflict. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN 978-0393292398.
^ Li, Daitian; Tong, Tony W.; Xiao, Yangao (2021-02-18). “Is China Emerging as the Global Leader in AI?”. Harvard Business Review. ISSN 0017-8012. Archived from the initial on 2024-01-20. Retrieved 2024-02-16.
^ Knight, Will (January 24, 2023). “China Is the World’s Biggest Face Recognition Dealer”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the original on 2024-02-25. Retrieved 2024-02-25.
^ Bandurski, David (April 14, 2023). “Bringing AI to the Party”. China Media Project. Archived from the initial on April 15, 2023. Retrieved April 15, 2023.
^ Liu, Qianer (2023-07-11). “China to set AI rules with focus on content control”. Financial Times. Archived from the original on 2024-05-25. Retrieved 2024-05-21.
^ “China is shoring up the great firewall software for the AI age”. The Economist. December 26, 2023. ISSN 0013-0613. Archived from the initial on 2023-12-26. Retrieved 2023-12-26.
^ a b McMorrow, Ryan; Hu, Tina (July 17, 2024). “China deploys censors to produce socialist AI”. Financial Times. Archived from the initial on July 17, 2024. Retrieved July 17, 2024.
^ Colville, Alex (2024-11-27). “The Party in the Machine”. China Media Project. Archived from the original on 2024-12-02. Retrieved 2024-11-30.
^ Lyngaas, Sean (2023-09-07). “Suspected Chinese operatives utilizing AI created images to spread out disinformation amongst US citizens, Microsoft says”. CNN. Archived from the original on 2024-04-02. Retrieved 2024-04-08.
^ Milmo, Dan (2024-04-05). “China will utilize AI to interfere with elections in the US, South Korea and India, Microsoft warns”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on 2024-05-25. Retrieved 2024-04-08.
^ Farrell, James (April 5, 2024). “China Eying Election Disruption Campaigns-Including With AI, Microsoft Says”. Forbes. Archived from the original on April 8, 2024. Retrieved April 8, 2024.
^ Field, Matthew; Titcomb, James (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI has actually triggered a $1 trillion panic – and it doesn’t appreciate free speech”. The Daily Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Steinschaden, Jakob (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek: This is what live censorship looks like in the Chinese AI chatbot”. Trending Topics. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Lu, Donna (28 January 2025). “We checked out DeepSeek. It worked well, up until we asked it about Tiananmen Square and Taiwan”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “How China Is Using AI to Fuel the Next Industrial Revolution”. Time. Archived from the initial on 2022-02-05. Retrieved 2022-02-04.
^ a b c d “Artificial intelligence: Implications for China”. McKinsey & Company. Archived from the initial on 2024-02-04. Retrieved 2024-02-16.
^ Bresnick, Sam (June 2024). “China’s Military AI Roadblocks”. Center for Security and Emerging Technology. doi:10.51593/ 20230042 (inactive 1 November 2024). Archived from the initial on 2024-06-18. Retrieved 2024-06-18. cite web: CS1 maint: DOI inactive since November 2024 (link).
^ Takagi, Koichiro (November 16, 2022). “Xi Jinping’s Vision for Expert system in the PLA”. The Diplomat. Archived from the original on February 18, 2024. Retrieved February 17, 2024.
^ a b c d Artificial Intelligence and National Security (PDF). Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service. 2019. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-05-08. Retrieved 2020-04-30. This post integrates text from this source, which remains in the public domain.
^ Magnuson, Stew (July 13, 2023). “China Pursues Its Own Version of JADC2”. National Defense. Archived from the original on February 18, 2024. Retrieved February 17, 2024.
^ “China Military Power Report Examines Changes in Beijing’s Strategy”. U.S. Department of Defense. November 29, 2022. Archived from the original on May 25, 2024. Retrieved February 17, 2024.
^ Fedasiuk, Ryan (August 2020). Chinese Perspectives on AI and Future Military Capabilities (Report). Center for Security and Emerging Technology. doi:10.51593/ 20200022.
^ Knight, Will (October 10, 2017). “China’s AI Awakening中国 人工智能 的崛起”. MIT Technology Review. Archived from the original on 2020-05-13. Retrieved 2020-04-30.
^ Mozur, Paul; Markoff, John (2017-05-27). “Is China Outsmarting America in A.I.?”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 2020-04-07. Retrieved 2020-04-30.
^ Brown, Michael; Singh, Pavneet (2018 ). China’s Technology Transfer Strategy: How Chinese Investments in Emerging Technology Enable A Strategic Competitor to Access the Crown Jewels of U.S. Innovation (PDF). Defense Innovation Unit Experimental. p. 29. Archived (PDF) from the initial on 2020-04-12. Retrieved 2020-04-30.
^ a b Kan, Michael (September 15, 2022). “Biden Curbs China’s Investment in US Tech Firms With New Executive Order”. PC Magazine. Archived from the initial on February 20, 2024. Retrieved February 19, 2024.
^ a b Sanger, David E. (2022-09-15). “Biden Issues New Order to Block Chinese Investment in Technology in the U.S.” The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on 2024-02-20. Retrieved 2024-02-20.
^ Cheung, Sunny (October 31, 2024). “PRC Adapts Meta’s Llama for Military and Security AI Applications”. Jamestown Foundation. Archived from the original on 2024-11-02. Retrieved 2024-11-03.
^ Pomfret, James; Pang, Jessie (November 1, 2024). “Chinese scientists establish AI design for military use on back of Meta’s Llama”. Reuters. Retrieved November 1, 2024.
^ “Which countries and universities are leading on AI research study?”. Times College. 2017-05-22. Archived from the initial on 2020-03-02. Retrieved 2020-04-30.
^ “China’s brightest children hired to develop AI ‘killer bots'”. South China Morning Post. 2018-11-08. Archived from the initial on 2020-01-09. Retrieved 2020-04-30.
^ a b “China has become a scientific superpower”. The Economist. ISSN 0013-0613. Archived from the original on 2024-09-26. Retrieved 2024-09-27.
^ a b “Chinese AI has new ethical standards that suppress Big Tech’s algorithms”. South China Morning Post. 2021-10-03. Archived from the initial on 2022-02-03. Retrieved 2022-02-04.
^ Wu, Wenjun; Huang, Tiejun; Gong, Ke (March 2020). “Ethical Principles and Governance Technology Development of AI in China”. Engineering. 6 (3 ): 302-309. Bibcode:2020 Engin … 6..302 W. doi:10.1016/ j.eng.2019.12.015.
^ “Translation: Cybersecurity Law of the People’s Republic of China (Effective June 1, 2017)”. DigiChina. Archived from the initial on 2022-02-04. Retrieved 2022-02-04.
^ a b Horwitz, Josh (2021-08-27). “China’s coming information laws leave companies with more concerns than answers”. Reuters. Archived from the initial on 2022-02-04. Retrieved 2022-02-04.
^ a b Šimalčík, Matej (2023 ). “Rule by Law”. In Kironska, Kristina; Turscanyi, Richard Q. (eds.). Contemporary China: a New Superpower?. Routledge. pp. 114-127. doi:10.4324/ 9781003350064-12. ISBN 978-1-03-239508-1.
^ Zhabina, Alena (January 20, 2023). “How China’s AI is automating the legal system”. Deutsche Welle. Archived from the initial on March 29, 2024. Retrieved May 25, 2024.
^ Chen, Stephen (2022-07-13). “China’s court AI reaches into every corner of justice system: report”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 2024-03-31. Retrieved 2024-05-25. [H] umans will slowly lose free choice with an increasing dependence on innovation”, she said in a paper published in the domestic peer-reviewed journal Law and Social Development on Sunday. The wise court system, constructed with the deep participation of China’s tech giants, would also pass excessive power into the hands of a few technical experts who composed the code, established algorithms or supervised the database. “We need to look out to the disintegration of judicial power by innovation companies and capital,” she added.
^ Papagianneas, Straton; Junius, Nino (November 2023). “Fairness and justice through automation in China’s smart courts”. Computer Law & Security Review. 51: 100-101. doi:10.1016/ j.clsr.2023.105897. hdl:10067/ 2001290151162165141. Archived from the initial on 2024-05-26. Retrieved 2024-05-26 – through Elsevier Science Direct.
^ Pham, Sherisse (2018 ). “Chinese AI startup dwarfs global rivals with $4.5 billion appraisal”. CNN. Archived from the original on 9 April 2018. Retrieved 10 April 2018.
^ “China ramps up tech education to become synthetic intelligence leader”. NBC News. 4 January 2020. Archived from the original on 2020-01-10. Retrieved 2020-01-10.
^ Cao, Ann (2023-09-07). “Tencent launches Hunyuan foundation AI model for business”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the initial on 2024-06-03. Retrieved 2024-06-03.
^ Olcott, Eleanor (3 May 2024). “4 start-ups lead China’s race to match OpenAI’s ChatGPT”. Financial Times. Archived from the initial on 8 September 2024. Retrieved 27 October 2024.
^ a b c Zeng, Jinghan (2021-09-16). “Securitization of Artificial Intelligence in China”. The Chinese Journal of International Politics. 14 (3 ): 417-445. doi:10.1093/ cjip/poab005. ISSN 1750-8916.
^ Knight, Will (October 10, 2017). “China’s AI Awakening”. MIT Technology Review. Archived from the original on March 24, 2018. Retrieved April 3, 2018.
^ Guest, Peter (November 29, 2024). “Inside the AI back-channel between China and the West”. The Economist. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 2024-12-08.
^ Corvino, Nick; Li, Boshen (August 23, 2024). “Survey: How Do Elite Chinese Students Feel About the Risks of AI?”. Jamestown Foundation. Archived from the initial on 2024-08-24. Retrieved 2024-08-23.
^ Beraja, Martin; Kao, Andrew; Yang, David Y; Yuchtman, Noam (2023-06-23). “AI-tocracy”. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 138 (3 ): 1349-1402. doi:10.1093/ qje/qjad012. ISSN 0033-5533.
^ Mozur, Paul (2019-04-14). “One Month, 500,000 Face Scans: How China Is Using A.I. to Profile a Minority”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 2019-06-08. Retrieved 2024-02-25.
^ Sahin, Kaan (December 18, 2020). “The West, China, and AI surveillance”. Atlantic Council. Archived from the initial on February 26, 2024. Retrieved February 25, 2024.
^ “Autocracy and AI Innovation”. Stanford University Center on China’s Economy and Institutions. Stanford University. July 1, 2022. Archived from the original on February 26, 2024. Retrieved February 25, 2024.
^ “China’s AI-Tocracy Quells Protests and Boosts AI Innovation”. IEEE Spectrum. Archived from the original on 2024-02-26. Retrieved 2024-02-26.
Further reading

Hannas, William C.; Chang, Huey-Meei, eds. (29 July 2022). Chinese Power and Artificial Intelligence: Perspectives and Challenges (1st ed.). London: Routledge.